2 ms·
I address your safety concerns in the README. But seriously, how would you have designed this more Pythonically? It's an easy criticism to make, so back it up!
by bdr 17y ago
I address your safety concerns in the README.
But seriously, how would you have designed this more Pythonically? It's an easy criticism to make, so back it up!
- alnayyir 17y agoThe concept is broken, not the implementation. You need to know what's in your damn namespace. Edit: I'm sorry if you expected a more technical readout of what's wrong, but you need to step back and think carefully about what the Zen of Python actually means. I'm not a dogmatist, I learned to code in C and have since dabbled in many languages. However, I'm a strong believer in, "When in rome, do as Romans do".
- Chronos 17y agoI disagree about the concept being broken: CPAN and Gems work on similar principles, except that the download step is reserved for a human running an explicit installer program. Add a filesystem cache and some digital signatures, i.e. an offline mode and some way of declaring "I expect this module to be signed with this trusted RSA key", and I think it would be workable.