baudehlo

40 ms·

1. 391.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   Most senders seem to implement retries if they don't get a 200 response.
2. 392.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   If it's just a shared secret, why not just make a secret (and complicated) URL for the web hook? It's shared with the deliverer but as long as you're using SSL it should be just as secure. Speaking of which, the right way to
3. 393.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   Also I know the JVM crowd hates to admit it, but also Node.js. I was able to do 15k rps to our node API (which hit Postgres) on the last application I worked on. And that wasn't even on SSD. Node can be very fast on your own hardware.
4. 394.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   I use plexconnect with mine and it works well. But it is a bit of a hack. I'm getting more and more convinced that switching to the roku would be better.
5. 395.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   Here's a decent list: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Node-Hosting
6. 396.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   Pg's own A Plan for Spam is also an excellent introduction to Bayes for boolean comparison. http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html
7. 397.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   I have my profile setup for endorsements in Milking Cats, Fridge Shelves, and Electric Eels. I did this as soon as I realised how dumb this whole endorsements thing was getting.
8. 398.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   I have a product I'll be launching soon in exactly this space: mailing lists/forums/chat with github integration. Email me if you're interested in alpha/beta testing (see my profile).
9. 399.▲
   by baudehlo 13y ago

   Did you pay more for your text editor?
10. 400.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    By having them only listen on the local network (or localhost).
11. 401.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    The porting for Node was entirely done by one person. The bad news is it will also break all C++ extensions, which frankly I'm not looking forward to (both as a developer of said extensions, and a user).
12. 402.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    PGP encrypts the body of the email. It leaves the metadata as-is. There's a surprising amount of information in there - the subject, to/from, IP addresses, DKIM signing information, References headers, etc. This would likely be en
13. 403.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    It does the correction feature too. Try it :)
14. 404.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Would you be interested in something open source that does this? I would be willing to release https://www.emailitin.com/email_validator to github. It does all the same checks as this except for the "valid user part fo
15. 405.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Works on my validator (which is also free, and does the same checks as this one with the exception of knowing the Yahoo trick): https://www.emailitin.com/email_validator
16. 406.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Or do what we do at Hubdoc, and use both Node and Phantom. Node for performance where it's possible, and Phantom where the site has been built in such a way that scraping in Node becomes not worth the effort of figuring out all the wei
17. 407.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    I completely disagree. I've kept every email I've ever received or sent since 1996 (close to a million emails, all searchable/indexed) and it has proved extremely useful over the years to be able to find ancient emails very q
18. 408.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Except that's the very anti-definition of "just works".
19. 409.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    I don't see any mention of IR input. No way it will work as a TV device without remote control support.
20. 410.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    JGC had an article on pronounceable IPv6 addresses somewhere but I can't find it now. Maybe you'll have better luck with google than I did (or he'll probably read this and link it).
21. 411.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Don't Mint basically provide at least the "email alert" section that you're looking for? You can basically do all what you're after with scraping, though the banks may want you to keep it down to one scrape a day.
22. 412.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    I'd be so much happier implementing Facebook Connect if it gave me an OAuth scope that didn't include access to your friends list. I don't WANT that access, so why don't you provide a way for me to not look sneaky to you
23. 413.▲
    My experiment with StumbleUpon Paid Discovery(baudehlo.wordpress.com)

    1 points by baudehlo 13y ago|0 comments
24. 414.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Funny, I think in part it's because few people care. Maybe I didn't have the right keywords, but I just wrote an article about this for nginx/stud, and it got 2 upvotes on HN. Here's the HN link: https://new
25. 415.▲
    Setting up Perfect Forward Secrecy for Nginx or Stud(baudehlo.wordpress.com)

    19 points by baudehlo 13y ago|0 comments
26. 416.▲
    The 5 simple bits of sh/bash you should know(baudehlo.wordpress.com)

    2 points by baudehlo 13y ago|0 comments
27. 417.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    I totally get the use-case. As the author of Perl's DBD::SQLite I know exactly how high the demand for this sort of thing is. I think it's a great project and wish you luck with it. (and if you ever decide to lock the files, I&#x2
28. 418.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    No I get that, I'm not saying it should support those things, just saying you should probably document it clearly. People don't like to lose data. And append-only doesn't make you immune to corruption. There's still a po
29. 419.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    Just saying, I think it should be documented in the README.md as SQLite would be fine in those scenarios, which it tries to compare to.
30. 420.▲
    by baudehlo 13y ago

    From what I can make out, this won't work under cluster, right? You won't get new data written from one worker in another. It also has no locking so you can easily corrupt the database if you access it from multiple programs at on