basilikum

5 ms·

1.
by basilikum 5d ago
Proofreading yes, automatic "corrections" no
2.
by basilikum 6d ago
Why is your bar that they must be hurtful to everyone? What do you suggest to do when they direct the same behavior only a certain group in the space? You say that it does not have to be political and I agree, but what if it is? What if the
3.
by basilikum 7d ago
As I explained in another comment the false negative rate is irrelevant in this context.
4.
by basilikum 7d ago
The false negative rate would be interesting but is irrelevant in this context. I was replying to a comment claiming that most people take issue with the ethics of GenAI rather than the quality and that people have a high false positive rat
5.
by basilikum 7d ago
I trust Pangram's stats to be a good baseline.
6.
by basilikum 7d ago
I can say that my false positive rate is very low which is enough in this context.
7.
by basilikum 7d ago
I don't think this is true. There are people who claim everything is AI – maybe even to bolster their ego. But for a lot of things I can with high probability discern between AI and human in every day appearance and I know many other p
8.
by basilikum 7d ago
You are moving the goalpost. OC is not talking about thoughts having to be unique. You can very much read someone else's thoughts, examine them critically and come to the conclusion of agreeing with them. You might then write a comment
9.
by basilikum 10d ago
I'm asking sincerely, how do you get to the conclusion that it's those two?
10.
by basilikum 10d ago
Yes, hold people accountable for their actions. Don't take away their freedom. We may prohibit individual actions that involve a general tool when they harm others. That is compatible with a free society. We may not prohibit fundamenta
11.
by basilikum 10d ago
People accidentally hurt themselves with kitchen knives every day. They are also very often used for violent crimes. Clearly we need to regulate the kitchen knife industry more. There should be a central authority that sells authorized kitc
12.
by basilikum 10d ago
How did you dertmine it was those two companies? Also did you disallow them in robots.txt?
13.
by basilikum 11d ago
Mad props to the people at the Archive. You are the heros we need in a formerly open internet that is surrendering to evil big corps and closing down free access. The Internet Archive is in a really bad spot being attacked from multiple sid
14.
by basilikum 11d ago
Interesting topic. Started reading, the text is dreadfully lengthy, hard to stay concentrate on due to all the filler and mindlessly arranged words that obscure the actual content, notice AI tell signs. Stop reading, paste into Pangram, mos
15.
by basilikum 11d ago
I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding you or the article, but as far as I understand it from a cursory reading this is not a jailbreak. They use this one prompt for fine tuning and use the model's response to the prompt as the
16.
by basilikum 11d ago
We can't judge code quality without having the code.
17.
by basilikum 11d ago
Perhaps it would be useful if both of you could provide examples of supposedly good and bad code – the latter being the result of a genuine effort to produce good code with state of the art models. Just asserting that LLM code is good or ba
18.
by basilikum 11d ago
Because that's what's being discussed?
19.
by basilikum 11d ago
How do you even know what "side" I'm on?
20.
by basilikum 12d ago
Twitter heavily censors speech on the platform itself by downranking things they do not like without any transparency.
21.
by basilikum 12d ago
That is overly simplistic to the point where it is hard to interpret it as good faith. We live in a world where both the government is increasingly spying on everything, often in secret, as well as companies in every aspect of modern life w
22.
by basilikum 18d ago
Most captchas are invisible as long as they like your IP and device. But they still do the fingerprinting in the background.
23.
by basilikum 18d ago
Google may actively prefer AI slop over human quality content: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II2QF9JwtLc
24.
by basilikum 19d ago
Could you try to define these three separate concept?
25.
by basilikum 20d ago
VPNs
26.
by basilikum 21d ago
> Everyone has heard all the libertarian and contra-libertarian arguments going back decades; no one is learning from yet another go-round People are generally massively uninformed if not misinformed. People have not heard real arguments
27.
by basilikum 21d ago
Don't remove freedom from society - Be kind to people and give them equal opportunities to make sure they use their freedom for good. Prosecute bad apples with actual police work and don't let them ruin a good thing. Want to track
28.
by basilikum 21d ago
For what is this exploited in the wild when it doesn't include a sandbox escape? Is this chained with n-days?
29.
by basilikum 22d ago
I seriously wonder what ICANN is good for.
30.
by basilikum 1mo ago
We don't know a lot of things. That does not make it sensible to just make up unfounded claims about them. I don't know what you ate today. It would be insane for me to confidently claim that you ate two bananas and a pizza today.

More ›