3 ms·

Twitter heavily censors speech on the platform itself by downranking things they do not like without any transparency.

• zahlman 11d ago
  Back when they disliked and downranked the opposite kind of thing, nobody on your side agreed that it was "censorship".
  • basilikum 11d ago
    How do you even know what "side" I'm on?
    • zahlman 11d ago
      From the fact that you are speaking about the site's actions in present tense.
      • basilikum 11d ago
        Because that's what's being discussed?
  • mitxela 11d ago
    Is there a difference between downranking "gas the Jews" and downranking "trans women are women", or are those both equally bad censorship?
    • zahlman 11d ago
      I mean, you could easily construct a mirror image of both of those, and I would say that that's closer to the reality of what the content available to downrank is actually like. I don't think questions like yours are engaging honestly or in good faith.
      • angoragoats 11d ago
        Answer the question.
        • zahlman 9d ago
          No. I already explained perfectly well why the question does not deserve to be answered.
          • mitxela 9d ago
            No you didn't. You basically said "nuh uh, I don't like it"
            • angoragoats 9d ago
              The person you’re replying to isn’t going to substantively respond, because fragile snowflakes typically won’t engage when they recognize that answering a simple question exposes their hypocrisy.