bargl

9 ms·

31.
by bargl 6y ago
I'm going to start spreading this around. It's a comment by someone else who points to an interview of the WeBull CEO and why they had issues. It's pretty clear that this is a process issue, not necessarily a RobinHood is e
32.
by bargl 6y ago
I'm going to start spreading this around. It's a comment by someone else who points to an interview of the WeBull CEO and why they had issues. It's pretty clear that this is a process issue, not necessarily a RobinHood is e
33.
by bargl 6y ago
While actually a good question, I am reading a bit of snark here. Don't spend your time on anything you don't want to, but if you want to learn about .NET GC then either research the author or research other deep dives into .NET G
34.
by bargl 6y ago
This was my biggest take away from this article too. When you have a big project, you have to keep a consistent architecture. You need to keep using the same tools and patterns so that you have cohesion in your code base. The worst thing a
35.
by bargl 6y ago
I agree it's not the only thing contributing, but this would be a great place to experiment with those kinds of changes.
36.
by bargl 6y ago
I've been using DDG for a while now as my primary search. I've found it does a much more literal searches, but doesn't always interpret the intent of my sentence as well as Google does. I find myself using the !g at times wh
37.
by bargl 6y ago
I come to HN for fairly civil conversation on difficult topics. If we can't do it here, I honestly don't know where else I can do that. I agree that it's become a flame war, and IMO part of the issue is that at times people
38.
by bargl 6y ago
middleclick - Your original comment was fairly clearly against HN guidelines for posting. Your comment about votes is also against their guidelines (I feel for you I've broken this from time to time myself). If you'd commented on
39.
by bargl 6y ago
I'm guessing it would be more practical to make a method by which dang could easily reinstate a users' messages/account after receiving the required legal documentation. I also assume it only applies to Polish citizens, fili
40.
by bargl 6y ago
I fully agree with you on this.
41.
by bargl 6y ago
And the laws changed. Hopefully we'll see that. We can't expect companies to be our moral compass.
42.
by bargl 6y ago
Agreed. And these companies are following what they believe is morally correct. Also, this isn't going to be effective Parler is a website, people can just browse to it in Chrome/Safari... We should be promoting apps that encoura
43.
by bargl 6y ago
It's legal for entities outside the government to censor things. IANAL so if I'm wrong let me know. But my understanding is that censorship is perfectly fine for any company.
44.
by bargl 6y ago
Good point. To kind of latch onto what you said, I'd say that there is 60% of those 74 million who would have benefited from a Twitter ban which was well justified. They are more on the fence and can be persuaded by the tides of big
45.
by bargl 6y ago
I feel like after the twin towers were blown up. It was less than 100 individuals that were the impetuous for one of the worst pieces of legislation I know of. The Patriot Act. Which was voted on in a complete state of fear. Creating an
46.
by bargl 6y ago
I agree with the action and disagree with their justification. Because of the weakness of their justification, this could be further gasoline on the fire for his 74 million supporters. I frequently find myself having to argue with said sup
47.
by bargl 6y ago
I know Trump supporters, and even they (the ones I know) don't justify his tweets. If Twitter had used numerous previous tweets, I could personally go and argue with those supporters and feel like I was making headway. I don't ar
48.
by bargl 6y ago
This is gasoline on the fire. When banning someone like donald trump you need to have a great press release for justification. You need to point to something that people who are in the middle will read and think, yeah that makes sense, I&#
49.
by bargl 6y ago
Restricting peoples access to an app in the app store that is also a website is... an exercise in futility. What it does do is further back the extremists idea that they are being marginalized by big tech while others aren't. It is an
50.
by bargl 6y ago
No shit something got stolen. You can't have that kind of insanity inside of a workplace and expect to secure every device. There are multiple layers of security for the congress people, and many of them were exploited. They don&#x27
51.
by bargl 6y ago
I don't typically trust an article that breaks complex issues into blaming ONE thing. However, this one does have some really useful historical information in it and is worth a read. My issue with the "this is a problem because of
52.
by bargl 6y ago
> "The freedom to swing your arm stops at my face." Err not really, if you go full swing on someone and you "intended" to stop but they block your arm and punch you in the face, arguably it's your fault. If they
53.
by bargl 6y ago
We don't have a free market, or we wouldn't have fire departments, police departments, schools, military, funding for crops, or any government budgets. The idea that we are a pure free market is as absurd as saying that china is p
54.
by bargl 6y ago
It's still a valid concern. The government has mandated these businesses shut their doors it should also mandate that they get the assistance needed (which I'm hoping will come next year). Small businesses can't afford a lot
55.
by bargl 6y ago
Of course not. That's why they said 90%. You could argue it's 50% or 23.2832%. But there is a percentage of HN which has seen the movie if the OP has seen it. Obviously there's a percentage that hasn't seen/read
56.
by bargl 6y ago
Suggestion: To me this would be much more useful if it was available where I purchase my items. Like in Amazon, I see this as a web extension that could be super useful like honey. I wouldn't use honey nearly as much if it didn'
57.
by bargl 6y ago
This is, I believe the best solution.
58.
by bargl 6y ago
It's the law of unintended consequences. I used cloth bags thinking I was doing awesome. Then I found an article saying I had to use them 1000 times to equal the same carbon footprint of a plastic bag. (Not the article I'm link
59.
by bargl 6y ago
Yeah, saw that after writing the comment. This was a doh moment. The tone of the first half of the article and the second half don't reconcile for me. I thought based on the first part that it was still ongoing. Missed the convictio
60.
by bargl 6y ago
This is one of those situations where I read the article but not in its entirety and have to eat my words. I would have assumed an press release wouldn't use the word alleged unless this was an ongoing case.

More ›