baobabKoodaa

3 ms·

1.
by baobabKoodaa 6d ago
You might be right. I don't know. But regardless if Jev is frontier intelligence or not, Laya most definitely is NOT.
2.
by baobabKoodaa 7d ago
The point is that it's silly that the law is specific to onions, and the explanation "it's because onion market was small enough to be cornered" is unsatisfactory because there are other small markets too
3.
You could have built Jev(sgnt.ai)
2 points by baobabKoodaa 7d ago|0 comments
4.
by baobabKoodaa 7d ago
There are many other small markets as well, and yet, this law is not called the "Don't Corner Small Markets Act".
5.
by baobabKoodaa 7d ago
Jev claims to be frontier intelligence. Laya, while claiming to be "the open source version of Jev", is using a tiny open weight model with a tiny context window. Anyone who has experimented with tiny models knows that they are fa
6.
by baobabKoodaa 7d ago
If you need a reasoning model, then that is a System 2 decision, not a System 1 decision. This thread is about "Laya", a "Jev" competitor/precursor, which is a System 1 thing.
7.
by baobabKoodaa 7d ago
So you're not even trying to defend your claim? Reminder, you said: > I had used versions of bert to achieve the same functionality years ago I remember when BERT came out. I played with it. Other people played with it. You couldn&#
8.
by baobabKoodaa 8d ago
> output text according to the people who made Jev, it does NOT output text. it's a closed model, so we can't inspect the internals, but i would just take their word for it. just because the API responds with JSON text, does no
9.
by baobabKoodaa 8d ago
it's an AI generated webpage that uses small LLM models to produce structured output. it has nothing to do with jev.
10.
by baobabKoodaa 8d ago
In the link of the comment I was responding to, they explicitly say that Jev is not LLM-based: > Is Jev just a smaller LLM? > Jev is neither small nor an LLM, hence being off the intelligence Pareto curve.
11.
by baobabKoodaa 8d ago
Why is this slop getting 200+ points on HN? This should be flagged to oblivion. This has no relation to Jev, other than that it makes fun of Jev and tries to confuse users what this is and what Jev is.
12.
by baobabKoodaa 8d ago
this is slop
13.
by baobabKoodaa 8d ago
It's a closed model and they claim that it's not LLM-based, so I'm not sure why you are claiming that it is LLM-based.
14.
by baobabKoodaa 9d ago
Anyone who believes this news story should create their LLM slop bot to trade on prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi. These acceletards provide a great influx of money to many human traders on these platforms.
15.
by baobabKoodaa 14d ago
You people just never stop, do you? At some point you're gonna have to look back at all the times you said "LLMs have hit a wall" and look at what the progress was since the last time you said that. Please do go ahead and rev
16.
by baobabKoodaa 14d ago
Your link is from 2013. You're intentionally using the term "Agent" to muddy the waters. Don't do that.
17.
by baobabKoodaa 14d ago
No. You don't "defet" (sic) "incorret" (sic) arguments by making up new definitions for existing words. Stop doing that.
18.
by baobabKoodaa 17d ago
the first "sentence" just seems to continue indefinitely into word salad
19.
by baobabKoodaa 17d ago
> These responses seem to me to make it abundantly clear who's telling the truth here. Since it is clear to you, can you articulate what it is? I was unable to infer "the truth" from your message.
20.
by baobabKoodaa 18d ago
The last tech job I worked at which had a bonus structure had the bonus amount set at 100 euros (not a typo).
21.
by baobabKoodaa 19d ago
Telegram is openly supportive of cyber crime. I don't think it should be labelled as terrorist organization, but it's not far from that.
22.
by baobabKoodaa 21d ago
People who disable JS are very likely to have delusions like this.
23.
by baobabKoodaa 26d ago
> "radical left" is not an accurate recitation of "anti-racist, anti-sexist" Gaslighting again. The quote was "anti-fascism, anti-racism, anti-sexism". See how you "accidentally" forgot to mention
24.
by baobabKoodaa 26d ago
Hey, I'm sorry about my other message. I tried to tell another user in this thread to go f* themselves, and I seem to have accidentally clicked the wrong "reply" link in the tree and so my message went to you instead. What yo
25.
by baobabKoodaa 26d ago
> Declaring that the State Department's language is "accurately reciting" is equating. Now you are just imagining the word "terrorism" into a sentence that does not include the word "terrorism". As a re
26.
by baobabKoodaa 28d ago
I have never equated those.
27.
by baobabKoodaa 29d ago
In this case the US State Department is accurately reciting what this organization says about itself openly: https://www.inventati.org/about
28.
by baobabKoodaa 1mo ago
Your response seems to be missing the point completely. Gruber thinks "best" writing is produced by choosing the "best" word (highest scoring token) at each step. This is very clear from his writing.
29.
by baobabKoodaa 1mo ago
You will understand if you run some LLM models with a greedy sampler that does that. The text quality begins to deteriorate rapidly. This is a very counter intuitive result so I don't blame you for not understanding until you actually
30.
by baobabKoodaa 1mo ago
Cyberpunk dystopia vibes

More ›