baidifnaoxi

16 ms·

1.
by baidifnaoxi 2y ago
Row zero?
2.
by baidifnaoxi 2y ago
This feels like classic Microsoft. Put some great marketing out there. , claim the victory and deliver the actual product months from now. This puts any other vendor or company in a bad place with investors and the public. You have to love
3.
by baidifnaoxi 2y ago
God, I miss Sierra games. Such a big part of my growing up.
4.
by baidifnaoxi 2y ago
Doesn’t matter unless they follow through with this and are willing to give up revenue to do security. MSFT always puts this garbage out to safe face, but the organization always reverts to speed and money over anything else. Untrustworthy.
5.
by baidifnaoxi 2y ago
Not to mention they were out in their Paris availability zone for a month last year.
6.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
Did anyone catch that Elon Musk provided the fix. What?!
7.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
I can’t help thinking how tests like these could be abused by malicious governments around the world. I think I’ve been watching too much Black Mirror
8.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
Im not a mathematician, but does this have potential application in some Neural Networks and such where dangerous connections or isolated information flows could exist?
9.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
Bingo. The for profit stuff was probably ok with the board to raise capital. But the closeness with Microsoft probably went too far for the board.
10.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
Occams razor. He probably pursued a sale to Microsoft without the boards approval. Hes buddy buddy with Satya. Board basically said no, thats not our mission. Firedd
11.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
- Cant be a personal scandal, press release would be worded much more differently - Board is mostly independent and those independent dont have equity - They talk about not being candid - this is legalese for “lying” The only major thing th
12.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
Honestly if even $1 of public money goes toward research, the work, data, journal, etc should all be public domain. End of story. That should be a basic requirement of taking public funds.
13.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
“Nine people familiar with his thinking”
14.
by baidifnaoxi 3y ago
This seems to happen a bit too often tbh on all things Databricks.
15.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
What’s going to happen: Trucking companies are simply going to leave CA. They will deliver goods to the border. Then some enterprising company with electric trucks will pick those up at the border and deliver into CA. Congratulations, you’v
16.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
Agree, this movement seems almost non-existent. Seems like SK is more suffering from an overwork culture that leaves little time for anything outside of work. Fastest way to destroy fertility rate is wage slavery.
17.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
Pay gap studies are notorious for being overly ignorant of confounding factors. There probably is a pay gap but it’s incredibly hard to quantify and many studies choose to look only at $$ versus benefits (schedule flexibility, maternity lea
18.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
- Employers adding as requirement - Government free money policies - Virtually guaranteed loans that made money easy and invented lenders to lend exorbitant sums without questioning the efficacy of the degree - Colleges reacting to demand a
19.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
Wow. Yeah. It’s not just moral or societal, I guess. It’s also is influenced by $$$$
20.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
This is why I oppose ESG. It’s being pushed by the financial institutions under the guise of sustainability. But now you have many things unrelated to climate that have been show-horned in. It’s fine to create regulation that’s voted upon,
21.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
This seems like a bad idea. But hey, to our congress that has no concept of money or anything, of course it seems like an amazing idea.
22.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
Good. Claw back the sold stock value as well from top execs. It won’t make a drop, but it’s more than these corrupt/stupid banking execs got in 2008.
23.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
So many hyphens in this abstract
24.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
Most of the rail is meant to transport people from low density areas to city centers. I’m not sure how you would solve that problem without doing that?
25.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
I agree with the premise - not all situations benefit from usage-based pricing. However, this discussion misses many dimensions of what makes usage-based pricing valuable. It’s akin to a poorly developed benchmark that doesn’t consider all
26.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
You may be right - in theory. But existence of Journalist collaboration networks make this a moot point. Google JournOList and tell me there isn’t any coordination. Edit - one other point, so many articles are also sourced from Reuters and
27.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
This. Offices are hugely distracting. All sorts of things to take your attention away and add the hierarchy element and your are obligated to talk to higher ups if the “swing by”
28.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
This looks great. Good call on not making yet another plant based meat.
29.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
And so reliable to
30.
by baidifnaoxi 4y ago
Wrongthink

More ›