azangru

11 ms·

151.
by azangru 10mo ago
> How easy is it to hire people with experience in this? When NoRedInk switched to Elm, Richard Feldman, who was asked about whether this impacted their hiring experience in any negative way, said that on the contrary, hiring had never b
152.
by azangru 10mo ago
> Do you ever... There probably is a big difference between 'do you ever' and 'how often do you'. I very rarely visit websites that I want translated; so rarely that I can tolerate google translate, or copying and pas
153.
by azangru 10mo ago
> It's literally the only way to download apps. Is it? I don't think I've ever downloaded anything from Apple's app store. Hmm. What have I got? Chrome. Installed from website. GIMP. Installed from website. LibreOffic
154.
by azangru 10mo ago
> One language has 2 jobs, and the other language 13k jobs. I doubt you'd think for more than a second. The Hacker News website runs on Lisp. How many jobs do you see on the market that ask for Lisp? And yet, for what it is, this si
155.
by azangru 10mo ago
Right :-) That article did read as satire; but then, it is hard to tell what is satire anymore. I can hear people say the things he catalogues in the article; and I might agree with some of them, like the pollution of the window namespace,
156.
by azangru 10mo ago
> No Jobs > Another practical reason not to use htmx is that there are, rounding off, zero htmx jobs. > I just did a search for htmx jobs on indeed and found a grand total of two: one at Microsoft and one at Oak Ridge National Labo
157.
by azangru 10mo ago
> Those courses that were basically “we’re a top university and we let someone record the class from the back” were a literal life changer. Honestly, that was all I wanted. Does anyone remember what happened to UC Berkeley? They had a lo
158.
by azangru 10mo ago
What's wrong with it? Squads look like regular small teams. Tribes look like several teams working on the same product and having to coordinate their work. Each team has specialists, who like to hang out together and talk shop, formin
159.
by azangru 10mo ago
What was the "dead giveaway" referred to in the pasted tweet? Was it the dash, that people assume for some reason regular folks never use? Or was it something more interesting?
160.
by azangru 10mo ago
Sorry. I am an idiot. Checked the wrong url. Please ignore.
161.
by azangru 10mo ago
Has anyone noticed that the response for the blog page has a header: "x-robots-tag: noindex, nofollow"? What's the purpose of this header on a content page? UPD: Sorry, never mind, I inspected a wrong response.
162.
by azangru 10mo ago
> Equal opportunity for next generation. What does this mean? I suppose it can't literally mean equal opportunity, because people aren't equal, and their circumstances aren't equal; but then, what does this mean?
163.
by azangru 10mo ago
Is the package name a continuation of react team's tradition to start react project names with the letter "f"? :-) Fiber, forget, fire, fizz, flight..
164.
by azangru 10mo ago
> Google throws products under the bus, but not so much OSS projects. It abandoned the Material Design web components project, which, I think, attracted some Polymer people. Speaking of Polymer, it has evolved into Lit; but I understand
165.
by azangru 10mo ago
> Intentionally? It's RPC. Remote procedure calls. An approach that has made a comeback in the front-end space recently. There was tRPC; then react made a splash with the release of its server components; then other frameworks start
166.
by azangru 10mo ago
> I will never rely on another Google-backed UI framework. Lit is pretty good :-) Though it was never positioned as a framework. And it recently was liberated from google.
167.
by azangru 10mo ago
> That’s why they were later named to angular JS and angular, to avoid confusion. Angular.js and angular. That's not confusing at all :-)
168.
by azangru 10mo ago
> They had minimal API changes in the last 10 years The 1 to 2 transition was one hell of a burn though; people are probably still smarting...
169.
by azangru 11mo ago
> How does one stay motivated to grind through LeetCode? Isn't the prospect of upcoming technical interviews motivation enough?
170.
by azangru 1y ago
> - The homepage right now is extremely lightweight and uses next to no javascript. The new design just looks like the same generic Starlight template I'm not sure we want to use a javascript framework. While it provides a lot of fe
171.
by azangru 1y ago
> Browsers and servers impose practical limits on URL length (usually between 2,000 and 8,000 characters) but the reality is more nuanced. As this detailed Stack Overflow answer explains, limits come from a mix of browser behavior, serve
172.
by azangru 1y ago
Looks like the site is already pretty fucked up — it wouldn't load.
173.
by azangru 1y ago
> As a developer who has learnt programming as a hobby, is it better to stick to some other safe ways to develop front end like thyme leaf or plain js or something else. Oh, absolutely, there is no question about it. Fewer dependencies m
174.
by azangru 1y ago
> which one is easier? > Switch all projects to `pnpm`? Sorry; I am out of touch. Does pnpm not have these security problems? Do they only exist for npm?
175.
by azangru 1y ago
> When I first saw React.js, I had a quick glance and thought that it was cool, they finally figured out how to do a Cocoa-like MVC UI framework in JavaScript. > Overall, though, the use of a true MVC UI framework seemed like a great
176.
by azangru 1y ago
> Does react still mess up the DOM and, for example, using Google Translate? One might argue that it is Google Translate that messes up the DOM for react :-)
177.
by azangru 1y ago
> At least React doesn't try to abstract too much What do you mean? The DOM is abstracted away. Hooks are magical, and don't work like regular javascript functions. The scheduler, and the concurrent features are magical. The st
178.
by azangru 1y ago
> You could argue that the real innovation of React was "unidirectional data flow" Isn't this just how the DOM works? Data flows down through attributes and properties; events bubble up? > but React team made Flow archi
179.
by azangru 1y ago
Haven't we already gone through web3.0?
180.
by azangru 1y ago
> it implies there exists a neutral position that is somehow more correct than any biased one, which typically isn't the case. In many cases a neutral view can't even be formulated The prompt in the study was specifically instr

More ›