azan_

7 ms·

121.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Civilization is thriving and we are living in the best times (thanks to capitalism).
122.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Would be great if you'd lose job for plagiarism! Here's example [0] from Cambridge where they actually defend person that plagiarized A LOT. [0] https://retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/cambridge-jason
123.
by azan_ 3mo ago
It’s because their products are really bad. Last time I tried Gemini it repeatedly lied about running internet search when explicitly asked to do it. I know their models benchmark really well, but in real world the performance is abysmal.
124.
by azan_ 3mo ago
People already do.
125.
by azan_ 3mo ago
So wrist slap?
126.
by azan_ 3mo ago
People should get paid for reviewing. That’s the solution. Publishing companies rack in billions of dollars in pure profit exploring free labor. Once people actually get paid for reviewing, it becomes much faster and higher quality and you
127.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Honestly these examples absolutely DO look like generic AI slop, no offense.
128.
by azan_ 3mo ago
I think it's really far fetched to say capitalism is bad idea. It's great system, it has some problems, but the upside is so big and alternatives are so bad that it's really unfair to call it bad system.
129.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Not true at all. I'm from Poland which was occupied by communist for a long time, and I can guarantee you - the amount of scam we had under that rule was orders of magnitude larger than what we have now.
130.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Of course, every socialist country is actually capitalism and that's why it fails.
131.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Absolutely, there's no scam outside capitalism!
132.
by azan_ 3mo ago
I genuinely want to know what exact point you are trying to make, I'm not a mind reader.
133.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Where? Could you stop with the vague posting?
134.
by azan_ 3mo ago
What else they can do based on this?
135.
by azan_ 3mo ago
The comments there are absolutely unhinged. There are some good reasons for being anti-AI, but why dilute it with this kind of bullshit: > It is equivalent to book burning in the past. A form of thought control
136.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Yeah, why would it be bad for publishers? If anything they'd most likely encourage more book shredding!
137.
by azan_ 3mo ago
But that's not what I said.
138.
by azan_ 3mo ago
But they don't have to succeed, invasion of Baltic countries could potentially be enough to start WW3, even if russia does not have capacity to win it.
139.
by azan_ 3mo ago
It's not Ukraine that regularly threatens Poland. Russian propaganda is truly only for absolute brain dead - how can you at same time fantasize about bombing Warsaw, jam GPS over Baltic, do hybrid war across Polish-Belarusian border an
140.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Deescalation by escalation is a standard russian tactic.
141.
by azan_ 3mo ago
What you've listed here is not what russia lists as a reason for attacking Ukraine. And even if it was, it's still really shitty pretext.
142.
by azan_ 3mo ago
> If love to see supporting long term evidence for this (ie, not just localized "see, stonks went up in the 90s"). For what exactly, for growth? https://ourworldindata.org/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/qLq-8BT
143.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Yes, out of two alternatives - large growth but largest in top decile vs no growth, the first one is absolutely 1000x times better. And we know that every alternative to capitalism leads to much smaller growth. Also it's not just telev
144.
by azan_ 3mo ago
> Based on the past 40 years track record it seems unlikely that we will see any form of redistribution before it is existential. Literally every income decile is getting richer. Don't tell me you got fooled by that fake graph showi
145.
by azan_ 3mo ago
> I've worked with these systems for four years now and they have not meaningfully improved in that time frame. That's absolutely insane. Is it some case of anti-AI psychosis?
146.
by azan_ 3mo ago
It's not, it's basically something that happened. One unsolved problem was solved with the only human input being telling LLM to work harder and to actually solve it after few failed attempts.
147.
by azan_ 3mo ago
If you say "find some unsolved graph theory problem and counterexample for it" and LLM actually does it, is it really you that solved the problem? That's the difference vs other tools.
148.
by azan_ 3mo ago
Math is literally the most g-loaded thing there is.
149.
by azan_ 3mo ago
What meme?
150.
by azan_ 3mo ago
They actually can't, but even if they could - expensive private viewings are much more fair.

More ›