3 ms·
> If love to see supporting long term evidence for this (ie, not just localized "see, stonks went up in the 90s"). For what exactly, for growth? https://ourwor
by azan_ 3mo ago
> If love to see supporting long term evidence for this (ie, not just localized "see, stonks went up in the 90s").
For what exactly, for growth? https://ourworldindata.org/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/qLq-8BTgXU8yG0N6HnOy8g/8357a2ca-8463-4f53-b717-14298defc200/w=1620 https://ourworldindata.org/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/qLq-8BTgXU8... here
- tossandthrow 3mo agoThat increasing inequality is generally preferable for everybody.
- azan_ 3mo agoBut that's not what I said.
- tossandthrow 3mo agoThat is literally what you said > large growth but largest in top decile vs no growth, the first one is absolutely 1000x times better