azan_

4 ms·

1.
by azan_ 7d ago
Elsevier, springer and mdpi have literally billions dollars in profit thanks to this free labor. Why would university pay for performing labor for for-profit companies? The system is broken and we should name things as they are - it’s free
2.
by azan_ 7d ago
Yes, I understand how their delusions work, though I'm sure it's not universal - it's obvious that for most of higher ups the real reason is that they feel sad they can no longer control their neighbours. What's interest
3.
by azan_ 7d ago
Note that Warsaw pact fell not because russia allowed it to, but because russia was too weak to do anything about it. You just lost the cold war and became 2nd or 3rd grade country. You should wake up and let go of your imperialistic ambiti
4.
by azan_ 7d ago
I've read already 4 different explanations here for why you've invaded Ukraine, each dumber than previous (ok, maybe not each - the one with CIA fundraising white supremacist that performed genetic experiments and tortured childre
5.
by azan_ 7d ago
[flagged]
6.
by azan_ 7d ago
So talking works only when russia gets what it wants and if it doesn’t you can invade other country? It doesn’t sound like taking, more like extortion.
7.
by azan_ 7d ago
> And the way to solve the differences is by talking! Why did you attack Ukraine instead of talking then?
8.
by azan_ 7d ago
What are you talking about? Ukraine did not go to war for my beliefs, they got attacked by you and they die because of you.
9.
by azan_ 7d ago
I'd rather just pay for Ukrainian drones. Maybe you'll even run into one when you get mobilized!
10.
by azan_ 7d ago
Indeed, Europe would roll over russia really quickly.
11.
by azan_ 7d ago
Is it satire or something that russians actually believe?
12.
by azan_ 7d ago
[flagged]
13.
by azan_ 7d ago
Good point - we must remember that russia attacked Ukraine already in 2014, Ukraine agreed to their conditions and it still did not prevent russia from wanting more. History repeats itself - appeasement never works.
14.
by azan_ 7d ago
Ok let's work from the basics. Please answer this question - is russia the aggressor in this war?
15.
by azan_ 7d ago
> I can not believe the europe would risk all its heritage and for what? Quite contrary - Europe is preserving it's heritage. Remember that russia does not want to stop with Ukraine - for example they want Poland to quit NATO. What
16.
by azan_ 7d ago
Yes, in this case one side (russia) attacked other (Ukraine), which is just defending itself. It's very clear who is the aggressor here. This entire conflict could be prevented if russia did not attack, that's it.
17.
by azan_ 7d ago
Didn't russia attack Ukraine?
18.
by azan_ 7d ago
> russia ? lol, they can't even manage Ukraine ( with our aid ) And that's why they want to attack Europe. They hope that it will either cause eu to stop supporting Ukraine or at least that it will give them good negotiation po
19.
by azan_ 7d ago
[flagged]
20.
by azan_ 8d ago
if murder: verdict = guilty
21.
by azan_ 9d ago
Very useful. That’s a weird question.
22.
by azan_ 9d ago
And how do you think it will work? Do you really believe that once competition to serve top 10% get really fierce, no company will try to capture the remaining 90%?
23.
by azan_ 12d ago
I don’t want to crate account there because I’ll get into endless useless discussions. And you can’t use this website without an account.
24.
by azan_ 13d ago
I don’t trust Altman at all, but still he’s 100000000x better than trump administration.
25.
by azan_ 13d ago
I’m really glad us achieved nuclear weapon before nazi germany.
26.
by azan_ 13d ago
You really need to let your priors go if you still use this tired trope of next token prediction. It’s as useful for discussion as saying that human brain is made of fat, protein and carbohydrates - yeah that’s true, but it’s useless observ
27.
by azan_ 14d ago
On a sidenote - I don’t think non-proliferation will last much longer. War in Ukraine has shown that you actually need nukes.
28.
by azan_ 14d ago
Yes, water not used for human consumption should be more expensive (we should stop subsidies for that). Of course it won’t affect datacenters because they don’t use that much water, but well at least get rid of the most inefficient agricul
29.
by azan_ 14d ago
Note that there are no trillionaires anymore - spacex stock went down and musk „lost” a lot of money so rejoice, poor must be much better off now that we do not have any trillionaire.
30.
by azan_ 14d ago
Who will pay for services performed by AI? How will they make money?

More ›