avs733

61 ms·

781.
by avs733 5y ago
How far do you want to take this argument? Warning people about someone's creepy behavior isn't a punishment, it's a warning that they might violate my moral code and I should probably avoid them. Is me avoiding them punishme
782.
by avs733 5y ago
> Do you believe every man is a liar? No, I believe we are all our own unreliable narrator > Can a man change their spots? Absolutely > Is it acceptable to attack someone in the court of Twitter, victimise them, hurt them, and hurt
783.
by avs733 5y ago
this is typical of people self-labeling as, and seeking pity for, being 'cancelled' in my experience... What happened is quickly glossed over in vague terms with a half hearted apology and treated as a mere unimportant sideshow to
784.
by avs733 5y ago
Eh...peer learning is nearly as effective, especially when the choice is between a peer and a teacher who holds beliefs about education based in a transmission model of education
785.
by avs733 5y ago
What really needs to die is lectures themselves. They are a TERRIBLE method of creating learning. However they are very good at creating the perception of learning. That contradiction is not surprising, it speaks to how we actually learn, b
786.
by avs733 5y ago
do you have ANY evidence to support this claim? or are you relying on a third party article's interpretation and then extrapolating that even further?
787.
by avs733 5y ago
I'd put my money on Strava.
788.
by avs733 5y ago
Yes. We should all consider the consequences of what we work on shouldn't we? The fact that other people don't isn't a counter argument...
789.
by avs733 5y ago
a gang of narrow minded bullies? This is what we are calling the field that ended polio and smallpox.
790.
by avs733 5y ago
I would argue, philosophically, the broken clock isn't right twice a day. That clock is simply saying the same thing as people who are right. It's claim about what time it is has no credibility. I have a friend who's Toddler
791.
by avs733 5y ago
I'm not mad, I just have been taught that retcon'ing evidence to fit a narrative is not the same thing as science. It doesn't matter how well it fits or evidence, it should be rejected because the base structure of the argume
792.
by avs733 5y ago
no one is deleteing anything...they are simply learning, as science does, and noting that prior knowledge was incorrect. That is fundamentally different from people screaming without evidence. A broken clock is right twice a day, but it is
793.
by avs733 5y ago
The poll question isn't useless because it lacks context, it lacks context specifically because it is a loaded question. The question is operating by design. This hand waving about 'uncomfortable talking about' and 'long
794.
by avs733 5y ago
yup...the article started with an outcome and a belief and found sought evidence to justify it. That this is the best evidence they can find? really? It's not about agree or disagree...its just that if this is the best argumentation yo
795.
by avs733 5y ago
thats the kicker. BOTH of those could easily fall under the single strawman question that this article bases its flawed argument off of. Views that you could 'feel' not free to express could include: - Stating facts about their po
796.
by avs733 5y ago
The term for this (most commonly in social sciences research ?) is 'double barreled question'. It is bad specifically because you do not know which question is being answered. The obvious bias of this website is...obvious. Often I
797.
by avs733 5y ago
I'm reading the article you linked down thread and after an initial skim I am not confident the article actually makes the point you are claiming.
798.
by avs733 5y ago
>If we claim that the culture of law enforcement is corrupt, we should be encouraged by the turnover. It could also be that the better ones are resigning...unfortunately. Unfortunately complicated. Public employees are still what make an
799.
by avs733 5y ago
Why does it seem like coddling? What do you mean by coddling?
800.
by avs733 5y ago
1) don’t assume these are the rich kids…because they are not. Not even close. 2) don’t assume rich kids don’t opt in to homelessness
801.
by avs733 5y ago
I appreciate the frustration, and why this got shared, but realistically...this is the current observation and gives so little data about how we got here that I worry about the comments attributing blame to your post. Two distant family mem
802.
by avs733 5y ago
I deal with a lot of 18-19 year olds as my primary job is teaching first year engineering students. I will tell you it is a LOT more complicated than this. This type of single point simplification and pronouncement about 'coddling&#x27
803.
by avs733 5y ago
These are also two classes of consumer facing product that are most regulated and likely to contain electronics (I'm excluding cribs...because my partner laughed at me when I suggested building our crib and told me that was fine as lon
804.
by avs733 5y ago
Just for clarity because the title is a bit muddy: This is the first time an unmanned drone has refueled a manned aircraft. Specifically, a prototype of the Navy's future unmanned carrier based tanker drone transferred a small amount o
805.
by avs733 5y ago
Because bad faith arguments don't necessitate logical consistency. The motivation here is they want to regulate Google for political purposes, not that they want to regulate utilities better. If you have questions, Dave Yost's pol
806.
by avs733 5y ago
> I'd set up attractive repair shops around army bases and government offices (quick turn around, competent service, reasonable prices) and just mirror every phone that comes through. Most of it will be useless, but I'm sure th
807.
by avs733 5y ago
Point taken, and agreed with, but F1 is a traditionally pretty bad example for this. They regularly, including during the Schumacher days, changed rules to try and make things closer.
808.
by avs733 5y ago
Another way to look at it is "this is what it costs to ALSO make something in the US" you aren't just paying to the difference in labor, you are paying for the difference in requirement, documentation, redundancy, small marke
809.
by avs733 5y ago
'it really is about the science' so what is your education level regarding interpreting vaccine trials data? it really is about the liberty...which really is about the selfishness...I may disagree with your perspective but my bigg
810.
by avs733 5y ago
> If you "trust the science", it'll give you immunity, and you don't need to worry about me at all. Me getting vaccinated protects more than just me. It protects, for example, those who cannot get vaccinated by limiti

More ›