3 ms·
Because bad faith arguments don't necessitate logical consistency. The motivation here is they want to regulate Google for political purposes, not that they wa
by avs733 5y ago
Because bad faith arguments don't necessitate logical consistency.
The motivation here is they want to regulate Google for political purposes, not that they want to regulate utilities better.
If you have questions, Dave Yost's political donors are public information:
https://www6.ohiosos.gov/ords/f?p=CFDISCLOSURE:48:0::NO:RP:P48_REPORT_ID,P48_TYPE,P48_LISTTYPE:359044204,CONTRIBUTION,simple https://www6.ohiosos.gov/ords/f?p=CFDISCLOSURE:48:0::NO:RP:P...
- zackees 5y ago...because Google decided that entire classes of people will be kicked off their systems if they have the wrong political opinion. Despite the fact they promised in their IPO they would never do this. “Don’t be evil” “Organize the worlds information and make it Universally Accessible and useful”. Now they (and Facebook and Twitter) are banning political candidates they don’t like AROUND THE world. Getting Google and big tech to not act like a weaponized foreign influence operation not “political”. It’s ensuring a free market of ideas and equal access.