aurelijus

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by aurelijus 9y ago

   At least where I am from you must go and cast a vote privately alone on paper. So this can't be executed on big scale, you could only force couple people to cast a specific vote without getting kicked out or arrested.
2. 2.▲
   by aurelijus 9y ago

   Got 4/5. Assumed that text field is text type, which doesn't let you have index, so it was an obvious bad fit..
3. 3.▲
   by aurelijus 9y ago

   It depends. How about, do not use one step to verify/authenticate/authorise/etc - Period. Biometrics is not a password, so it should not be treated as one. There are many good advantages of using fingerprint to do something w
4. 4.▲
   by aurelijus 9y ago

   This means code review process is completely wrong. All these "nitpicks" should be automated by linters and code review should be more about implementation, structure, performance, etc..
5. 5.▲
   by aurelijus 9y ago

   Skipping code reviews for faster pushes to "trunk" does not sound like a stable solution. Why not just encourage faster reviews and smaller diffs..
6. 6.▲
   by aurelijus 14y ago

   Awesome guys, really nice and fast funding process (though if payment fails you are stuck with plain red message in blank page, you could improve on that one). The advice I can give you - steal best parts from Kiva, they have great and suc