asdkjh345

7 ms·

1.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
People don't pay attention long enough. We have 20 solid years of non-stop doomsday predictions, all of which were wrong. Nobody pays any attention to this, they just go right on believing all the new baseless doomsday predictions.
2.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
>No, that is a take that you have been fed by those who have gigantic vested interests in stopping any attempts to challenge THEIR power and profits. Like who? The evil oil companies who are one of the major drivers of the greenwashed c
3.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
Multiple people have made every attempt at having a discussion with you, and yet you continue to ignore this and keep repeating the same red herring. Nothing in your post has any relevance to the discussion, and your statement was false, a
4.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
Yes. Can you explain the difference for me? The only difference I can find is that colonialism was done with the support of the people in the country, while immigration in white countries today is being done against the wishes of the peop
5.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
You said "for any reason". That is incorrect, and I gave you an example to demonstrate this fact.
6.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
>Wow. You went off the cliff. Paring racial discrimination with a difference of views is asinine. I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. You made an objective claim, I provided an example that demonstrates it is false.
7.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
>Do you complain about balance issues for places like say, Voat as well? As well? I don't complain about them at all. Pointing out that it exists when people deny it is not complaining. >I seem to only hear concerns about balan
8.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
When you get banned for simply posting facts that one group dislikes, while "KILL ALL WHITE MEN" is totally fine and acceptable, there's definitely a balance problem. The idea that one socio-political viewpoint is objectivel
9.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
>It also increases evaporation Which increases rain, as I said. The most highly productive ecosystems on the planet are hot. Rainforests are not scary bad things to be afraid of. California is running out of water because they draw to
10.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
Haskell. Despite the unsubstantiated claim to the contrary, haskell is much faster.
11.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
It isn't, it is much slower. Download them both and try a few tests for yourself, GHC produces much faster binaries.
12.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
Possibly, although as I mentioned he's not alone in his claims, he does have a fair bit of evidence, and he is most certainly not western nor is his claim new.
13.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
There is plenty of evidence, and it is not new or western. This claim was made in the 1980s, by Soviet defectors. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/700262.Ice_Breaker
14.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
>an entirely-optional war that likely wouldn't have begun if Germany hadn't decided to start it There is a great deal of consensus among historians that it was absolutely inevitable and unpreventable. A reasonable minority eve
15.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
The USDA recommendation is just to provide the small amount of vegetables a family normally eats, not to provide all their calories. 50 sq m is absolutely tiny, and even with the most calorically dense crops like a 300 bushel/acre cor
16.
by asdkjh345 7y ago
I think you are talking about two different things. He said "With intensive farming one would need around 200 - 500 m² to produce the calories required." You seem to be talking about producing some vegetables and still getting t