asdasf

15 ms·

91.
by asdasf 13y ago
My experience is the exact opposite. Only absolutely beginner php/mysql guys do that. And they do so because they don't understand joins. You can't even do outer joins implicitly without vendor specific extensions (which a
92.
by asdasf 13y ago
That is a lovely hypothesis, but I believe testing it would falsify it.
93.
by asdasf 13y ago
>Personally, I see Haskell as the C++ of functional language You should try it some day, it is absolutely nothing like your misconceptions.
94.
by asdasf 13y ago
Which is more complicated and less expressive than haskell? That seems like a pretty bizarre choice.
95.
by asdasf 13y ago
Your first paragraph seems to be entirely nonsense. Almost everyone was first introduced to a high level language. This did not prevent anyone from understanding that those languages are themselves software, written by people. In fact, y
96.
by asdasf 13y ago
Haskell is a far cry from just lazy ML. Oddly enough, your summary of go would be far more appropriate for haskell, which makes go's concurrency handling look primitive.
97.
by asdasf 13y ago
>I really like web development Odds are you would find it every bit as soul crushing as tech support if you did get a job doing it. Web development still carries the stigma of "I know how everything should be, you just do the grunt
98.
by asdasf 13y ago
What you describe doesn't need an index on the foreign key, that's the point I was making.
99.
by asdasf 13y ago
Postgresql advice from a mysql user. Foreign keys don't need indexes on the from side, and they should be pointing to a primary key on the to side so that is already covered. In mysql you likely want an index on the from side because
100.
by asdasf 13y ago
>Gilad provides a humble deconstruction of common myths and claims of the FP culture He argued with a joke from a comic and lost. Even he would laugh in your face at the notion that there was anything humble about his talk. >He is
101.
by asdasf 13y ago
>manipulative propaganda film from the anti-meat lobby You seem to have a real emotional problem with the idea of vegans existing. Why does that cause you so much distress that you make up bizarre nonsense like a "anti-meat lobby&q
102.
by asdasf 13y ago
>Why don't more people post videos and articles about the mistreatment of migrant farm workers in America? Lots of people do? Why do you imply that people caring about animals and people caring about people are mutually exclusive?
103.
by asdasf 13y ago
I am fully aware of what the typeclass defines. It is an inappropriate name. I don't think there is anyone who likes those names. Everyone uses <> instead of mappened. Append is inappropriate because you do not append lots of
104.
by asdasf 13y ago
>Ok... I think I'm getting trolled at this point. If you don't want to discuss something, then don't post. You are not making any sense, and calling people trolls does not help at all.
105.
by asdasf 13y ago
>In almost any other language, were such a thing to exist, monoids would not be called monoids but by some descriptive term which conveyed an intuitive sense of their meaning and use There is no such term, that is the point. Offering up
106.
by asdasf 13y ago
>This progression seems somewhat interesting to me. As does the desire to not have to simulate code in your head. But none of that has anything to do with monads.
107.
by asdasf 13y ago
You are using the exact reasoning I was talking about. Monoids are monoids. That is what they are. 99% of programmers are not familiar with them. If you call it "addable" or "joinable" or "appendable" then
108.
by asdasf 13y ago
I don't understand your first statement. You currently lose custody of your children by default, that's the problem. Attempts have been made to change the law in some states to fix that, but were defeated by NOW and their suppor
109.
by asdasf 13y ago
No it doesn't. It is a common term for tables that are just foreign keys to other tables, generally for expressing many to many relationships.
110.
by asdasf 13y ago
CLOS and scala have very little in common, both in the functional side and the OO side. Ocaml and F# are better examples. Can I ask what you think made this a brilliant talk? It seemed like the standard "I don't want to have to
111.
by asdasf 13y ago
>The points he makes against obtuse names based in category theory are valid No, they aren't. When you have a class of "things" that doesn't have a name most people are familiar with, you are left with two options.
112.
by asdasf 13y ago
Protip: when you are arguing with someone who is "on your side" as if they are your opponent, you might just be an overzealous douche who wants to argue too much.
113.
by asdasf 13y ago
I'm not. I am blaming you for presenting a statistic in a misleading way. You are suggesting that courts are fair because fathers get custody when they seek it. But you are leaving out the part where they only seek it in cases of ab
114.
by asdasf 13y ago
You go right ahead and keep on pretending you make $200k/year then, I'm sure if you pretend hard enough it will suddenly become relevant.
115.
by asdasf 13y ago
Nothing you said addresses my point. Notice how only 8% of fathers are seeking custody? Why is that? Using statistics to deliberately mislead people is dishonest.
116.
by asdasf 13y ago
Did you notice how that study didn't control for anything ? Like say, the reasons that fathers were seeking sole custody? Fathers virtually only seek sole custody when the mother is abusive or grossly negligent. In cases where the
117.
by asdasf 13y ago
Construction jobs are highly paid.
118.
by asdasf 13y ago
You're joking right? Is this sarcasm? I dunno who you think this "we" is, but 99% of software people are not part of it. Hell, you even contradict your own fantasy tale, how are you getting fed 3 meals a day if you are only
119.
by asdasf 13y ago
PMI in 1984 was exactly what it says in the name, project management. It didn't become a programming methodology thing until the agile craze. Six sigma was big in the industrial world, not programming.
120.
by asdasf 13y ago
But the very core of XP was that it did have to be followed exactly. That there was 12 specific things you had to do. All of those things were existing things, that people already did. It was precisely the "doing all 12 of them exac

More ›