arnautdaniel

4 ms·

1.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
So your argument is that I'm somehow a lisp fanatic and I should be happy that at least one lisp made it into the current fad?
2.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
Tinyscheme doesn't have baked in and complete posix/libc/etc bindings. Also you'd have to say R5RS -> R7RS is somehow a fall into complexity which makes absolutely no sense. Scsh hasn't been updated for over a de
3.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
Because one day you go to look for minimal cli programs and find githubs littered with "minimal dependencies, only nodeJS!". It's madness. There's already several much better tools people should be using for these domai
4.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
Why? If you really want to do scripting in lisp, why would you not just use guile? This is just embracing complexity when scheme is a perfect fit, and already exists in multiple ways in the domain. Did Gauche stop existing? http:/&#x
5.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
The amount of code, libraries, and resources needed to make this glorified calculator on a "smartphone" is truly overwhelming. Could literally do the same thing extremely well with an ncurses program and a damn ssh link back to ho
6.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
Anyone who wants to see a modern forth with elements of common lisp that is focused on application development should check out Factor. Concatenative languages are really fun to use once you get over the initial hump. https://git
7.
by arnautdaniel 7y ago
Quantification seems to be the degradation of perception towards the proper understanding of human ability. It seems realistic to say that humans prefer simple matrices with which to view reality. Consider when someone common argues politi