armchairgen

3 ms·

1.
by armchairgen 3y ago
Around-the-clock bombing, missile and artillery strikes, and deep insertion of covert assets are not US/NATO doctrine? Did I watch a different invasion of Iraq than you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_
2.
by armchairgen 3y ago
No one's doubting Russia has built a capable defense over the last year however that's not changing the direction of the war. How many helicopters can Russia sustain to lose? They've lost several over the last few weeks. Supp
3.
by armchairgen 3y ago
I mean what's it matter though? HALO is just one option for insertion, the point is that there are multiple avenues of attack.
4.
by armchairgen 3y ago
How so? How is Russia establishing air superiority over Ukraine now? Or is going to change the tempo of the war into their favor? How does this pertain to them denying NATO+allies from probably eventually attaining air superiority in a hypo
5.
by armchairgen 3y ago
So how do they stop cruise missiles and other artillery? Stop decoy missiles? What happens when the enemy has exhausted it's supply of AA ammo? Or lost use of its radar?
6.
by armchairgen 3y ago
Do you think that the B-2 is the latest that the U.S. has[1]? It doesn't need to be singularly successful since it's part of a collective of redundant systems[2]. Air isn't working then increase missile strikes, missiles can&
7.
by armchairgen 3y ago
I don't really know if NATO+allies would establish air superiority. However my guess is that they may use a combination of tactics from HALO insertions[1], long range missile strikes from land and sea, and around-the-clock bombing from