Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arkis22
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
right. its THE BAD REPUBLICANS. not THE GOOD DEMOCRATS. completely ignore the never trump idea. (they didnt do this with trump huh?)
92.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
the downvotes in this thread are gross
93.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
the individual mandate has been ruled illegal btw. I'm sorry, but you're not denying that her point was my bill or nothing. you just seem to think that trumps desperation to pass a bill gives you legitimacy. which is, lets be clea
94.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
so here's the timeline of the bill. https://www.ehealthinsurance.com/resources/affordable-care-a... It didn't even matter that Lieberman was independent. he's literally not mentioned. and it looks like w
95.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
There you go again, where’s subtlety gone in this world?!
96.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
this is absolutely incorrect. there is literally 0 reason to dispersing your family for economic reasons. It is always cheaper to cohabitate and long term care facilities are extremely expensive.... Especially in the US.
97.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
No. the other side is millions of emotional people with incorrect data posting on twitter getting everything wrong but then getting retweeted thousands of times based on a headline. bless you that you think that doesn't do anything and
98.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
the closer you get to saying you want to have a beer with them, the longer my eyes will roll
99.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
the ACA was passed during a supermajority. You just said that democrats couldn't interfere with the republicans during theirs, so how on earth did the democrats pass a bill that they didn't like? Not a single republican voted for
100.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
there were however, millions of them and there still are.
101.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
wow its hard to argue with such things as demonstrative as "substantial daily influence" and "numerous initiatives" as well as being "present at white house deliberations" it wouldnt suprise me if what he had f
102.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
uh no. Trumps words dont hold value. Where have you been? "Trump says something dumb at 11" But yeah, the never trumpers words do, theyve been fantastically consistent.
103.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
Was it impossible? Youre quite sure? Or maybe it was just easier for them to call republicans fascist while forcing it through with a super majority? As opposed to the excellent state and not "unusually obstructive " form that dem
104.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
A source that they never made an important decision? Haha, its hard to prove a negative. Can you link a single decision they did make? Surely with such a strong opinion there are examples
105.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
"manipulative democrats didnt effect me and therefore are not relevant" enjoy your bubble, especially if you think the family actually made a single important decision and weren't just there for useless stature.
106.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
no, I don't. But I'm so glad that you'll suddenly being paying attention to nepotism appointments, like Lisa and Mike Madigan in Illinois. I'm just saying that you won't complain about them, and you didn't. Jus
107.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
he was never anyone's president. it's been 4 years of "never trump"
108.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
I've engaged with you on numerous points. you've ignored them all, and have never offered an alternative logical viewpoint. you're talking past me, and almost bragging that I have asked you questions you're ignoring.
109.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
"trump says something dumb" more news at 11 the presidency is not "not saying dumb things" it's signing or rejecting bills.
110.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
housing, education, and healthcare were cheap until the federal government got involved. you can make an exception for healthcare because of tech improvements, but the others are true.
111.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
democrats routinely accuse republicans of being racist. especially more than the opposite, so I'm not sure why you thought that would help.
112.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
I described the life experience of caring for the people you love as a good thing. you described it as "bitch now get back to work" we aren't arguing about the possibility of insurance ruining your bank account. as if the chi
113.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
lol what you are describing is responsibility. not slavery. yes, it is a responsibility to have a house for your family, to keep food on the table, and to work for their education. if you don't provide those things and rely on the gove
114.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
lol probably less than 5% of people actually gave a crap or thought he was from Kenya. it was more like, "liberal president who wants to do more, pushes through mass healthcare and finance reform without bipartisan support bad" th
115.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
add another one to the list. "they also run people off the road"
116.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
easy. I googled the population increase during a normal workday. During regular Monday - Friday business hours, the city's population surges by at least 20 percent -- or more than 160,000 people. https://www.kqed.org/lo
117.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
yes. you are surely more correct that covid has had zero effect on net domestic migration out of SF. a simple google search shows figures. there are lots. rent data is the simplest.
118.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
I mean... this is obviously incorrect?
119.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
billionaires are fine and few of them rely on real estate wealth. The real losers are the middle class whos savings are invested in securities that rely on corporate real estate. and then obviously the lower class because they get screwed n
120.
▲
by
arkis22
6y ago
it is. define the correlation
More ›