arkis22

12 ms·

121.
by arkis22 6y ago
in other words... Since we've given out federal education loans, educational outcomes have been drastically less effective
122.
by arkis22 6y ago
it might be worth considering why you thank that. members of government are normal people. you shouldn't consider it a favor from them to lower themselves to "normal" standards. this is a political advertisement.
123.
by arkis22 6y ago
depressing
124.
by arkis22 6y ago
please be specific. this isn't a place for twitter comments. what have I said that you think is delusional?
125.
by arkis22 6y ago
I think you should respond with a logical point rather than insulting me
126.
by arkis22 6y ago
fraud is never an easy tool. it's used when you can get away with it. why is it literally known as the cook county democratic machine without backlash? you're also assuming its easy for other politicians to use. as if counting vot
127.
by arkis22 6y ago
are you asking why politicians would bother to steal an election?
128.
by arkis22 6y ago
it shouldn't fit your narrative either. you believe in free and accurate elections right? I live in Chicago. I find it absolutely absurd that people don't think politicians steal votes.
129.
by arkis22 6y ago
If I had to pit 4chan against HN in a scavenger hunt, I would bet on 4chan. edit: in fact I think this happened. wasnt there an online quiz we lost at a couple years ago?
130.
by arkis22 6y ago
I don't think I've ever used an app I wouldn't have preferred as a web app
131.
by arkis22 6y ago
so if given a choice between bribing a port and not bribing a port, you would bribe the port.
132.
by arkis22 6y ago
would you go to an actual port if you're hauling a ton of heroin?
133.
by arkis22 6y ago
you really did waste twenty minutes
134.
by arkis22 6y ago
ah yes, the robot California dream. Space for me, but not for you.
135.
by arkis22 6y ago
the economically disadvantaged shouldn't be missed in San Francisco? who will live 5 people to a house in a bad suburb to make sandwiches for tech workers? so much for the California dream.
136.
by arkis22 6y ago
You are so shockingly flexible.
137.
by arkis22 6y ago
I think you're dishonest
138.
by arkis22 6y ago
shame on you for judging the quality of a post based on its page number on hacker news. it's like you couldn't be more shallow if you tried. if you call someone racist don't back down.
139.
by arkis22 6y ago
You were in both portland and seattle? have you considered your correlation to madness? Is it a 100% correlation? I'm sorry, but are you saying protesters didn't have their phones on them? As opposed to literally every other prote
140.
by arkis22 6y ago
I don't think you really understand the meaning of the words "I had the personal experience of being targeted." Mostly because you seem to ignore the words you use. Especially the word "targeted." Also because you c
141.
by arkis22 6y ago
they have mentioned being explicitly targeted multiple times
142.
by arkis22 6y ago
your ability to use the word "personal" in a sentence doesn't take away from the way they used it. In fact it's a little weird. Personal in this sense clearly means 1:1. I doubt the commenter pepper sprayed themselves?
143.
by arkis22 6y ago
I'm really still missing your clarification... I'm not really sure what game blame you think I'm playing? > You can't specify the degree to which you think you were personally selected. > And I never claimed to. AN
144.
by arkis22 6y ago
Except really we've established you weren't personally targeted and were just a random person in a protesting mob...
145.
by arkis22 6y ago
your own definition relies on a 1 to 1 communication between people. so you're wrong right? I don't personally thank Rotary International for all their hard work. "I personally cursed the cop for pepper spraying me" Just
146.
by arkis22 6y ago
Right... Self Defense..! Are you uniquely capable of that? Is it difficult to be moral when everyone else isnt? SO CAN COPS ONLY SHOOT PEOPLE WHEN YOU THINK ITS OK?
147.
by arkis22 6y ago
You've done it poorly. You can't specify the degree to which you think you were personally selected. And you've given two examples of them shooting indiscriminately. So no, they didn't personally target you.
148.
by arkis22 6y ago
So you weren't personally targeted. In what way were you targeted? Were you doing nothing to arouse police attention? I think most first world countries have a gas they can use for riot control. Are you insisting that most first world
149.
by arkis22 6y ago
Were you personally targeted? As in there was a line of people that they walked past to personally give you a dose of chemical weapons? Gas is a chemical weapon. Pepper spray is a chemical weapon. Please don't compare Assad's use
150.
by arkis22 6y ago
You were asked to link an example of people not physically resisting. You linked Breonna Taylor, who's death while unfortunate, doesn't quite fit the bill. She had links to 2 known drug sellers, a warrant was being executed, and h

More ›