Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arcfour
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
391.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
This is needlessly pedantic unless you are writing from an OS, browser, etc. that you wrote entirely by yourself, without using an editor or linter or compiler not written by you, in which case I tip my cap to you.
392.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
But going to jail and getting an education are completely different things...nobody wants to go to jail.
393.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
> Another is (perhaps founded) anxiety about their child needing to have a way to communicate to the outside world in an emergency situation like a school shooting. Yes, a situation less likely to happen than being struck by lightning. V
394.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
This [post] is Claude generated, isn't it? Makes it a bit painful to read, to be frank, but nice work. I can't believe people get paid to write this junk (software). It's just...so bad.
395.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
At a high level, Docker and Podman implement the same standard for containers, but my understanding is that Podman implements more of said standard (more/newer features) and in a more standards compliant way. This can be a good or a ba
396.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
This seems to ignore the possibility of Windows having done them in a UNIX-ish way to begin with, which would be infinitely better than what Microsoft came up with.
397.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
"We don't know a lot about this, what could go wrong?!" Sigh...
398.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Personally I leave the anonymous daily usage ping enabled in the (perhaps naive) hope that my use of Firefox being counted might help keep it afloat/popular. I guess that's not really in the spirit of a privacy-focused hardening g
399.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Same here! I also love my bulleted lists; however, there are some key differences in how I write: - *Less formatting*: I don't start every bullet point with bold text - *Varying structure*: I don't start each list item with a one
400.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Hell, you can parse XML and infer complex types! Good luck doing that with JSON though.
401.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Amazon/AWS use them (.aws), so does Google (.google) but I agree, it is pretty funny how many companies seemed to get on board (out of fear of being left out?) and then...didn't use them for some reason?
402.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Run your own DNS then, if you're using your own DNS? Why are your queries for internal systems leaking out to the internet?
403.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Don't forget to file a bug report with the maintainers of Python, Bash, Node, Perl, Ruby, etc. that their interpreters can be used maliciously if given malicious code to execute.
404.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
This happens anyways, though. And I have to imagine it is already fairly easy to tell someone in prison to do something of this nature, it's not a ton of information to convey, exactly.
405.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
If only there was a product that moved this link to a more convenient location! I would buy it on the spot!
406.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
I love those as routers, firewalls, and other random devices on my mess of a home network where I just set things up for fun. Or as little NASes for friends and family that I can give to them for free or whatever.
407.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Simple estimates work surprisingly well for a lot of things because a lot of the 'unquantifiable' complexity being ignored behaves like noise. When you have dozens of factors pulling in different directions—some developers multita
408.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
You know, it's funny—I always hear people say they want to keep their Windows-only applications and run Linux alongside it, but I made the switch almost a decade ago and honestly can't say I'm worse off for it. And frankly, t
409.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
That is a much different response than "this article is not newsworthy at all, why would you even publish it?"
410.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
It was interesting to read about the impact that unconstitutional actions by the government had on actual people in a real case, and how a Supreme Court ruling remedied it (partially). What a bizarre response. Do you have something against
411.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
No.
412.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
No, I'm pointing out that people like yourself are unable to recognize (willfully) government interference resulting in negative outcomes with the government interference you champion. Does it hurt to have this level of cognitive disso
413.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
That has nothing to do with the DEA though. You're conflating different concerns.
414.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
They sure bungled that one then!
415.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
And this has nothing to do with insurance, but does have to do with government bureaucracy negatively impacting people getting treatment for an illness.
416.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
Right, so nothing to do with insurance or our system of it.
417.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
What does the DEA have to do with US health insurance, exactly?
418.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
I don't think that is in any way related to the original comment.
419.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
The fact that it would be extremely expensive to do so for what could amount to $0 worth of valuable information for months or years, if ever?
420.
▲
by
arcfour
1y ago
This is almost farcical. This is literally the opposite of anti-competitive. Please take a basic economics course and pass it before spouting off about economics online.
More ›