arcfour

20 ms·

421.
by arcfour 1y ago
They literally mention FlightAware and him using it in the article.
422.
by arcfour 1y ago
I'm not sure this is a useful data point or how it makes them morons?
423.
by arcfour 1y ago
You know this argument is in bad faith, and should feel bad for making it. But, even if the Civil Rights Act didn't exist, this is an excellent way to go out of business near-instantly.
424.
by arcfour 1y ago
This is only for images of money with a specific digital watermark; it doesn't detect the EURion constellation, so you can take your own and work with it just fine.
425.
by arcfour 1y ago
Yes, I have run into that once or twice but never to the extent that I would call it "sisyphean", haha.
426.
by arcfour 1y ago
Yes, they do, and if they dont, they should.
427.
by arcfour 1y ago
In the Go world, the whitelist approach is a popular alternative to the standard gitignore, since Go projects can kind of take any structure the developer sees fit. To me the normal approach makes equal sense. I create a file, but I'm
428.
by arcfour 1y ago
You can create a global gitignore when forced to work on a Mac that excludes these.
429.
by arcfour 1y ago
I have never once experienced this problem. Mostly because I don't work with people who blindly commit everything without even looking once to see what's in their commit.
430.
by arcfour 1y ago
Freedom of speech is freedom from being arrested for your speech . It is not the freedom to force others to give your speech a platform. Just like how it's not freedom to force other people to listen to your speech. If it is, then I e
431.
by arcfour 1y ago
The payment provider has the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason, being forced to do business with someone is the same thing as compelling someone to speak (or not speak). Two wrongs don't make a right.
432.
by arcfour 1y ago
I wasn't mocking anyone and have no idea what you're talking about, sorry.
433.
by arcfour 1y ago
You are watching for something that might happen, in case it does happen. You are warning others that something dangerous has happened, because you have seen it. There is an actual danger. This has always been intuitive for me (once it wa
434.
by arcfour 1y ago
A tool was offered that can accomplish what you want, with a very small amount of added effort on your part. No, you do not have to "stay up to date on AI stories"—if you see one, add the keyword to the list and move on. There are
435.
by arcfour 1y ago
I do, but I feel more confident in a suit than a sweater. A three-piece is a bit much though.
436.
by arcfour 1y ago
I want a company where I can wear a suit and not stand out. It feels nice to look good.
437.
by arcfour 1y ago
AI also doesn't work like that unless it's extremely bad, but you're free to rant about nothing, nonetheless.
438.
by arcfour 1y ago
You should read the article before commenting; your comment is a non-sequitur.
439.
by arcfour 1y ago
As someone with no qualifications on this beyond occasionally playing some flight simulators, I can't think of a reason you would ever intentionally move the switches in flight (barring an emergency like a leak or fire or something) an
440.
by arcfour 1y ago
I wonder what would happen if you sent this nearly verbatim to executive leadership. It is quite a thorough, candid description of a serious problem. At least I certainly wouldn't be happy to learn that my product was bursting at the s
441.
by arcfour 1y ago
You think that society now, more than ever, punishes this after what we've been discussing—numerous instances of people glorifying it and (attempting to) excuse poor behavior through it?
442.
by arcfour 1y ago
Try responding in good faith on a non-throwaway account.
443.
by arcfour 1y ago
And thank God Uber and Lyft destroyed the dysfunctional Taxi racket, might I add.
444.
by arcfour 1y ago
But you would need something that interprets the MP4 or MP3 as an executable, or an exploit in whatever decoder software is being used that allows you to hijack execution and run your own code instead of decoding and playing the media? Or y
445.
by arcfour 1y ago
A lot of AWS services are built on other AWS services. Like Lambda, SQS, and other such "core services" are used by others under the hood.
446.
by arcfour 1y ago
But they didn't break the law. The NYT articles were not algorithms/AI. It's bad faith because they are saying "well, they should have done [unreasonable thing]". I explored their version of things from my perspecti
447.
by arcfour 1y ago
What Scrooge sued a school for exhibiting a film for educational purposes?!
448.
by arcfour 1y ago
Feels like bad faith to say that knowing full well that 1. This would also be a massive legal headache, 2. It would become impossibly expensive 3. We obviously wouldn't have the AI we have today, which is an incredible technology (if i
449.
by arcfour 1y ago
Disabling ligature rendering in the omnibox seems significantly more sane and safe than this (why wouldn't you do that already?! URLs need to be displayed clearly - not be "aesthetically pleasing").
450.
by arcfour 1y ago
I can definitely relate to this post. (And don't get me started on those auto-generated SDKs in Typescript, eugh!) I am far from an expert on type safety or JavaScript, so take this with a large grain of salt, but for anything I write

More ›