aogaili

10 ms·

151.
by aogaili 7mo ago
You can't assume what you want, the facts on the ground are clear, we are moving to drones, AI, robots. And the nations who don't move that direction will not have a chance to fight any war due to the asymmetry in the cost. It wou
152.
by aogaili 7mo ago
I think we reached the end of your arguments because we are repeating. As I said, I don't think this is the same as the past, not even close. You can't assume the same results from a very different preconditions, yet you keep doin
153.
by aogaili 7mo ago
I actually have zero believe in the rationality of the leaders, you only need to listen to one speech to see the irrationality. However, systems don't care about people irrationality, it will force them to behave in certain ways. We ar
154.
by aogaili 7mo ago
You don't think the absurdity of drone vs drone economic warfare coupled with the reduction in global energy will reduce the probability of future wars? I actually think it will. Because in the examples you gave, the world was not as c
155.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Agreed. Unfortunately, diplomatic conflict resolution is prone to failures and the cost of failure is really really high. What Iran is doing is telling the empire that their war has a cost on their economy and reputation. And the only reaso
156.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Today yes, unfortunately. But my argument is for the future that we are starting to get a glimpses of. I'm not negating the currently genocides, I'm hoping for a future in which we don't have war at all due to the absurdly of
157.
by aogaili 7mo ago
So what are you advocating? you either vote a better future or want to keep what we currently have. You either agree with the future I suggest or disagree, or you think it won't happen and you would then have to argue why.
158.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Regarding your commend on energy, I think it is actually an argument on my point that fighting wars is going to be even more absurd. If the world is running short of energy then fighting a war that further consumes energy without clear win
159.
by aogaili 7mo ago
I understand your pessimism, but with all due respect, your argument is weak. I didn't say our preferences, voting, or opinions will change the system. I believe the system is being reshaped by new technology and a shifting world order
160.
by aogaili 7mo ago
You are arguing today. This is the first kind of wars we are seeing of this nature. But Iran is hitting exactly where it hurts, global supply chain, and now the US will be pressured by the global economy to either retreat or commit a genoci
161.
by aogaili 7mo ago
You didn't understand my point. I said in the future (not now) the world might trend to having wars similar to those of playing video games. And I said this might be better because we just give politicians another medium for conflict r
162.
by aogaili 7mo ago
I think will it will emerge as we get into multilateral world order. Given that those drones depends on global supply chains, satellite images, natural resources across the world, we could imagine that a in multilateral world, if the bigger
163.
by aogaili 7mo ago
How is it really old when we have completely new AI/Robotics enabled warfare that would allow nations in the not distance future (not today) to engage in a war without human involvement? We never had anything like this before? How woul
164.
by aogaili 7mo ago
So you want this system to stay? You are advocating for loss of life?
165.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Think in the future, I speak about a future, and you repeat it is happening, yes of course it is happening today, this tech is just being adopted.
166.
by aogaili 7mo ago
This speculation in the future if this technology keeps being adopted and the world would have multiple strong players. Would you rather keep the current system? how do you really think the war in Iran or Ukraine would end? It won't en
167.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Well, because they reject the idea of making a war a physical video games of drones, therefore, they would be advocating keeping the current system? My point was that we are better off with abstracting away the war, so if you downvote that
168.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Yes exactly. Like an arm wrestle, those who can demonstrate they have the better swarms, better AI, better supply chain, better innovation, win the war. And the other nation surrender. There is for resolving extreme national conflicts. If o
169.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Found it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8-I9nRAnDk This is like the future after the scenario I describe happens. But I diff, is that we keep the game, but change the medium. Humans are war oriented by nature, like chim
170.
by aogaili 7mo ago
I know it is not. I'm just saying in the future if all became drones war and we disallow genocide, then what do you think will happen? Of course I acknowledge real life is lost right now, all I'm saying give politicians a video ga
171.
by aogaili 7mo ago
And what is your point? you just re-enforced my main assertion?
172.
by aogaili 7mo ago
A disrupted global consensus-based algorithm.
173.
by aogaili 7mo ago
You either agree or disagree with the idea of genocide. And if you disagree with idea of genocide, then this is becoming closer to video games as more drones are deployed which is my thesis. But if you agree with the idea of genocide, then
174.
by aogaili 7mo ago
The majority of nations? majority of people on earth? We are going to a multilateral world and to win a war you need secure the appeal of majority. If the majority think your war is illegal they can cut you off from the world economy. It is
175.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Interesting, need to watch that.
176.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Yes, but what you are missing the cost of total elimination of the other side. For example, in Iraq, Saddam was able to use chemical weapons and wipe out the resistance, this is no longer an accepted solution by majority of people on earth.
177.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Yes we are not fully there yet, but we are getting there. We are seeing the transition right in front of our eyes.
178.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Yes, but it not like before. We (as humans) are getting more strict about losing people's life. We don't allow genocide, we don't allow colonization and enslavement, at least the majority of nations agree that this is not acc
179.
by aogaili 7mo ago
At this point might as well just play strategy video game and call it a day? Both sides staring at screens, controlling drones fighting each other.. why use physical drones at all? abstract it away and play video game? In the near future, w
180.
by aogaili 7mo ago
Is this for real? stupid humans, stupid decision now blaming the new kid in the blog..an arrogant hubris president, and the department of war, and corrupt Israeli lobby with a PM that wants to destroy a country of 90 million people...then t

More ›