aogaili

9 ms·

121.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Gemini said The point isn't that one side is "good." The point is that your binary notion of bad and good is far too simplistic for this reality. We are talking about nuclear powers threatening to send a country of 90 million
122.
by aogaili 6mo ago
That's exactly it, and what's more they are kicking the abused dog even harder expecting submission. At this stage, it seems it would rather die or push the abuser away.
123.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Your perspective on who is being liberated and who is doing the liberating relies on a simplistic narrative. Ironically, the central figure of that narrative, Donald Trump, has openly stated that he does not mind seizing oil or returning th
124.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Are you suggesting I provide a citation for the President's claims? Beyond his reputation as a loose cannon, it is difficult to fathom why he would boast about such a thing. From the beginning, the primary objective of this conflict ha
125.
by aogaili 6mo ago
I think you are right, I've also stopped social media myself recently and left with nothing but YouTube and the occasional visit on HN for tech. With that said, and I'm aware that HN audience are mostly in tech but I always though
126.
by aogaili 6mo ago
So the country waging wars from the sky, threatening to take their oil, annexing Greenland, suffocating Cuba, the only country who used nuclear bombs twice...is what?
127.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Those are not neutral protests, those are armed fraction to take down the government, any existing government would fight back. He said it clearly: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/6/has-trump-confir
128.
by aogaili 6mo ago
That's exactly it. They admitted supplying anti-government rebels with weapons. Imagine a country comes and arm a group in the US to rebel against the government..
129.
by aogaili 6mo ago
US armed rebels, that is their history, Israel wants to the current government down at all cost. They did that with Iraq, ISIS, they trying with Kurdistan.. I'm not defending a theocracy, but this is not how countries are freed. And he
130.
by aogaili 6mo ago
I'm just really puzzled by people frankly, one would expect Hacker News to be of higher caliber. Read the history, watch real geo-political analysis. But even without that, a presidents in who screams profanity on social media, threate
131.
by aogaili 6mo ago
It is crazy that comments like this are getting downvoted when it is clearly the truth.
132.
by aogaili 6mo ago
I keep getting downvoted and flagged, but there is noway anyone in good faith would support this war crime. A president who threaten to send a country to stone age, saying in front of everyones face that he wants to take the oil.. I don&#x2
133.
by aogaili 6mo ago
The western analyst and thinkers don't yet understand what is the story the makes this current governance stand. You can't understand something when your mental model doesn't have the depth for it it. The author still thinks
134.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Why you said that? I truly appreciated the conversation. But you I don't care if you here or not, I don't know you.
135.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Yeah, I grew up in Iraq, under more ruthless dictator that fought Iran. You are naive if you thank Israel/US are here to free Iran. A government won't last that long if there were to genuine supports. The fact you are outside of I
136.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Now people will be surprised why all the sudden future financial agents crush on April fools, why it can't count haha.
137.
by aogaili 6mo ago
You are polluting future training data.
138.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Thanks for the conversation and helping to refine my thinking.
139.
by aogaili 6mo ago
It is interesting that people give downvoting, so either they enjoy having the current wars continue and people physically killed, or they basically gave up on seeing a better future. Both cases, it is sad.
140.
by aogaili 6mo ago
"Trump started the war to distract everyone" that is your opinion. The war in middle east will not end soon, I agree with that. The question is whether the US will stay or not and how it will be rearranged. Trump is telling people
141.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Again, you don't understand my argument at all. Of course the goal of the war is to make others to submit by force and pain. That's obvious But you missing my point. If in the near future multilateral system, governed by AI, drone
142.
by aogaili 6mo ago
You are missing the point again. That has not always been case. Read my other comments why it's the same. But basically with AI/Drones + Global Interconnected Economy + Multilateral world order + Global Information = new system. W
143.
by aogaili 6mo ago
:D
144.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Again, poor argument. You can't speculate or think of the future..so if I do what you do, I say you are retarded - literally https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retarded . But that is not argument, that just
145.
by aogaili 6mo ago
Where is the assumptions? it is not just world. It is a world ruled by constrains and for better or worse human nature. There is no people involved at all, in fact my argument is that there will be no people involved in wars..I'm just
146.
by aogaili 6mo ago
I don't want to appear argumentative but it ironic that you said that you once believe as I do, because I also once believed as you do. What changed my mind is technology and not human nature. 1) Advancement in AI/Robotics/Dr
147.
by aogaili 6mo ago
But that is what is happening now. Drones vs anti-drones, what happens when robots comes online? robots vs robots..and people/AI at the command centre managing war from a UI that looks like star craft.
148.
by aogaili 6mo ago
What this had to with with my arguments regarding the nature of future warfare, the emerging world economical order? There is no point in history where we had such connected economies and this kind of autonomous war technology. All previous
149.
by aogaili 6mo ago
So future = fantasy in your mind? you can not speculate anything beyond the present? well, that is limitation in your thinking.
150.
by aogaili 6mo ago
This is all ad hominem and name calling, you provided zero counter-points.

More ›