antifragile

4 ms·

1.
Human Hibernation all the rage again at ESA
1 points by antifragile 12y ago|0 comments
2.
YC application asked: tell us something surprising that you discovered.
1 points by antifragile 12y ago|1 comments
3.
Why should you fill in a YC application even if you know you wont be accepted?
2 points by antifragile 12y ago|0 comments
4.
Why are PhDs worth less today then yesteryear? My thought for the day
2 points by antifragile 12y ago|0 comments
5.
The Art of Moonshot Part_3 Combo Biotech and Healthcare Moonshot in Action(slideshare.net)
1 points by antifragile 12y ago|0 comments
6.
by antifragile 12y ago
Hmmm :-) :-) This is a GREAT opportunity to dispel myths & confirm truths What Zucka said, I'm presuming he did, but haven't checked, has truths & flaws all at the same time. Actually it matters little who said it. This is
7.
by antifragile 12y ago
Appreciate the heads-up. Whenever I see such BIG and over the horizon forecasts I'm instantly dubious for at least two reasons: - Lots of Black Swans can circle and cross reality in short amounts of time. - Global averages don't
8.
by antifragile 12y ago
This is a quick 101 `shallow dive´ into on moonshots, if you're one of those BIG thinking types, but with feet firmly planted in reality. Part 2, forthcoming early next week, is my base template to hack, tackle, assault such innovation
9.
Moonshot Innovation 101: Part 1: What is it & do you fit the profile(slideshare.net)
1 points by antifragile 12y ago|1 comments
10.
Real-Deal BIG Ideas Hackers: Under Which Mushroom Will You Find One?
1 points by antifragile 12y ago|0 comments
11.
by antifragile 12y ago
One makes money to make a living, but you only truly enrich your life if you share some of what you have .... there is no other way, everything else is delusion. I know, I tried hard the other way. Hmm. Sounds like someone whose tripped-ove
12.
Little Things to Consider on You Next Healthcare Biotech Hack: (slideshare.net)
1 points by antifragile 12y ago|0 comments
13.
by antifragile 12y ago
I don't believe it's possible to tackle the gatekeeper or incumbents and win. You have to bypass them altogether before revisiting them. You have to, in Bill Gurley's words, have an orthogonal solution to the problem. My word
14.
by antifragile 12y ago
Categorically, yes. But, you're only likely to succeed if you for one, question the fundamental assumptions on which things are built. Anything less is incremental, or so far down-track in clinical trialing that it wont get funded or w
15.
by antifragile 12y ago
True, 'cause one drug for one condition now costs $4-12B, because the success rate is < 0.02%. There needs to be multi-functionality in our innovative efforts when we experiencing such high rates of disruption, say, extinctions.
16.
by antifragile 12y ago
I feel an interesting and charged buzz around this thread, so though to join in. Things appear hard and severely constrained because we habitually fall into the trap of thinking linearly and incrementally, as opposed to, at least sometimes,
17.
by antifragile 12y ago
Such vision. Good luck to you. Otherwise, maybe I'll have a cool job for you. :-)
18.
by antifragile 12y ago
Being a biotech is not a fundamental constraint unless you approach healthcare orthogonally. We already know that the BIG Pharma R&D model is broken and irrational. Actually words expressed by Merk late last year, as Well as Voltaire in