Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
anselm_eickhoff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
10y ago
This one is actually not too bad - there is only a very slight difference between "due" (which can mean both something like "shall be done" and "bound to happen") and "fällig" (which means only "
2.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
10y ago
But if you're already using message passing, this transition will be much more natural!
3.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
10y ago
Exactly, and messages are divided into buckets which contain only one kind of (type of message, type of receiver)-combination. If you then iterate over that, you are going to execute very similar code repetitively. I guess my epiphany was t
4.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
10y ago
(author) I made the mistake of writing a blog post targeted towards non-programmers, leaving away a lot of essential detail. For example that buckets only contain one kind of actor or message and because of indirect references can be deallo
5.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
10y ago
That and that I really want to avoid having to debug GPGPU code for the main simulation. But I'm not saying it won't become GPGPU at some point!
6.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
10y ago
(author here) others already addressed the point of premature optimization. It's about getting it kinda right from the start. Procedural building generation is indeed one of the other huge topics of the project and believable, unique s
7.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
14y ago
Improvement suggestion: Interpolate between the transmitted positions for a smoother animation. It's really difficult for me to detect movement directions at something like 3Hz.
8.
▲
Embracing Discomfort
(aeoutput.com)
2 points
by
anselm_eickhoff
14y ago
|
0 comments
9.
▲
Show HN: Distracted Goose, mini-game with procedural terrain
(aeoutput.com)
1 points
by
anselm_eickhoff
14y ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
You start with a line
(aeoutput.com)
1 points
by
anselm_eickhoff
14y ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
by
anselm_eickhoff
14y ago
You said what I thought much more eloquently. I found the business models and example emails really spammy if not even scammy. If what you offer is so vague that you have to do those silly engagement tricks, maybe it doesn't have real value