anoncoward111

6 ms·

1.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
can't wait for satellite to some day be robust and cheap enough to utterly destroy the notion of municipal internet. probably not in my lifetime, but hey, my 4g is cheap enough for my current uses :)
2.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I live in the USA and it happened in the USA. Studied abroad in UK and thought the term was fitting :)
3.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
What you are describing is precisely the same situation I had when I lived in an apartment building next to a long-term tenant . She simply didn't give a shit about the noise and trash she generated and all of us had to deal with it.
4.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
"Hahahaha, that's why we pay lobbyists!" --FB, probably
5.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I agree, but what I think I mean is, whatever theyre making on my direct deposit (probably $10 a month in fees to my employer) is less than the 0.83% of xx,xxx in my checking :) I would surely love 2% on my checking though! I thought 2% was
6.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
And it is entirely because the powers that be have rigged the market so that they can charge whatever they want. How have they accomplished this? First, they set strict quotas on who can be a doctor. Then, they set strict quotas on who can
7.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Highly agreed my friend. I have never ever been charged a single fee for anything by my credit union. I've been there for 10 years now. Aside from the money they make loaning out my deposits there, I don't think they've ever
8.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
hey nice!!! I really appreciate that info. Definitely a game changer then. I know a guy who was going to checks cashed, every week, paying those fees, cash under the mattress etc etc etc. If only he know Bluebird was around the corner! He e
9.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
In the USA, not meeting minimum deposit requirements, having a bad credit history or trackrecord with banks, not paying monthly fees, and not knowing how to use a computer can all preclude someone from being able to qualify or use a bank ac
10.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Regardless of whether you believe Youtube FB and Twitter "should be allowed" to remove such videos from their platform, the reality is that some percentage of people will continue to use their computers to host and view these vide
11.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
As someone who routinely had to hide from truant officers during high school, I turned out completely fine. My grades were bad at first, but shockingly, once I was allowed to sleep in until 10AM because my first 4 classes of the day were &q
12.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
There are multiple contradictory studies from Harvard about eggs. As a result, there are youtubers who believe that cholesterol is a benficial steroid-like substance for muscle growth (Snake Diet guy), and others who feel tha it causes hear
13.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I want to see everybody at DW go to prison for hosting comments on news articles which could be considered inflammatory. Elites need equal prosecution under law!
14.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
time for me to make a tarsnap gui ?? XD
15.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Does it have any choice? The official FAA incidents log has US pilots stating that the MAX is different to fly from normal 737s... ...and using their own words, is "unsafe!" to fly without additional training. It is unsafe to fly
16.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I believe Home Depot and Lowe's and small non profit "tool banks" already do this, an app displaying inventory and manuals would maybe be helpful
17.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Crony capitalists (what I would call mercantilists) certainly do not care about the will of the people. They are tyrants who hide behind a word they are corrupting. However I will defend to the death my right to exchange goods with you. I&#
18.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Preferred by the monopoly and nobody else, is what you mean, yes? Which is to say it is against the will of the people,
19.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I am not sure of the current regulations but engine swapping in Sweden and other modifications were completely illegal since the 90s and basically what Americans consider to be normal and acceptable is flat out not allowed on the roads in S
20.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
This is why junk yards and small businesses are a true blessing. I can pay someone $500 to put a $1000 engine into my car and get another 100,000 miles out of it, rather than "sorry that's not allowed, please go to the dealership
21.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Spare me. The pilots themselves have stated that they were completely unprepared to fly the plane safely in any condition with 0 training or warning.
22.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
In fact, potentially for political reasons, an intercepted communication between Russian rebels in Ukraine and Russia based military was released within hours of the crash on youtube It was released so quickly that some even thought it was
23.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
The French govt threw a pretty big fit about the Concorde, unwilling to admit it was "unsafe", but eventually gave up on the plane for "commercial" reasons. Aerospatiale was literally state-owned by the French.
24.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Agree. Anecdotally, I had a sales manager who graduated from Harvard. He was literally no different from any corporate manager I've ever had and just parroted whatever unattainable goals trickled down from the top, providing no clear w
25.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
This is excellent data and calculation work. I really appreciate it! I have a suspicion that if you were to remove all instances of terrorism and look at the crash rate of Boeing vs Tupolev, almost all Boeing planes would be way better exc
26.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I agree, in my eyes it is debate between "the plane is not safe to fly by anyone" and "the plane is safe to fly with additional training, when given" If the 737 MAX planes remain in the air in the USA, Boeing and US Govt
27.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Two crashes in 6 months and there's only 350 planes in existence is a pretty bad safety record that is probably on par with Tupolev. The US can tacitly blame "third world" pilots all they want, but with 300 people dead alread
28.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
Agree, but what I meant by more expensive was the new plane costs more than if they just kept making the old design through 2019. Fuel savings and etc is always nice to strive for, but now human lives and insurance companies and airline com
29.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
I retract my statement that Boeing is an arm of US government. President Cheetoh the aeronautics expert is going to break them up and we are all going to fly cessnas now Source: https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump&#x2
30.
by anoncoward111 8y ago
If that's true, that sounds like a thorough nightmare. Nothing gets me more heated than when an 85% perfect design with decades of real world use is replaced with something that is demonstrably broken + more expensive, simply because o

More ›