anonbcpolitics

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   US orders Chinese Consulate in Houston to close, fire spotted hours later(chron.com)

   2 points by anonbcpolitics 6y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   by anonbcpolitics 6y ago

   You focused on the wrong part, I could have left out "to govern". My point was there's no evidence of anyone using DMs, we're talking about public tweets. And there's no use talking about private communications beca
3. 3.▲
   by anonbcpolitics 6y ago

   It's not a new myth but a new suggestion. 230 was written for a bulletin board site in '96. Twitter and other social media behemoths still enjoy this protection. There's been proposals to hold these behemoths accountable by t
4. 4.▲
   by anonbcpolitics 6y ago

   > I think anonbcpolitics was ignoring DMs. Yes, because there's no evidence of anyone using DMs to govern. We don't know if a politician uses Signal, Twitter/IG DM, or other 1:1 communication apps, we have to handle those
5. 5.▲
   by anonbcpolitics 6y ago

   > If Twitter is a national security risk because people can hack it to speak in the official voice of prominent leaders, or discover state secrets through direct messages, that is nobody's fault but the government's, for relyin