3 ms·
You focused on the wrong part, I could have left out "to govern". My point was there's no evidence of anyone using DMs, we're talking about public tweets. And t
by anonbcpolitics 6y ago
You focused on the wrong part, I could have left out "to govern". My point was there's no evidence of anyone using DMs, we're talking about public tweets. And there's no use talking about private communications because the scope expands from Twitter to the individual's actions (sneaking around using Signal or similar, etc.).
- EvanAnderson 6y agoI work in IT in local government. Even with the public records and ethics training our employees receive we still encounter plenty of times when we must advise other offices re: the public records-related concerns associated with their employees using personal phones, email, and third-party hosted services in the course of their job duties (let alone "sneaking"). I would assume that, at every level of government, significant numbers of public records are being lost to free third-party hosted services.