anmaslak

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by anmaslak 9y ago

   Sorry to hear it didn't work well for you on mobile! We do test on mobile / iOS but seems like we didn't do a good job on this side - we'd love to learn more about what wasn't working well so we can work on that.
2. 2.▲
   by anmaslak 9y ago

   Thank you for going through the product and for the comments, incredibly helpful! (1) Agree with your feedback (amazing how obvious it is now that you point it out). We'll make the containers around the inputted symptoms shorter to gi
3. 3.▲
   by anmaslak 9y ago

   We've gone back and for the with the idea of showing the probabilities across the matches. Ultimately, to your point, we learned that at times it can scare users more than it can help them (e.g., if a condition goes from 0.5% to 1%)...
4. 4.▲
   by anmaslak 9y ago

   That's a great assessment of the space! We're focused on the midsize self-insured market for that very reason. The incentives are closely aligned. For example, ERs frequently take in patients hoping to get a UTI treated. Much of t
5. 5.▲
   by anmaslak 9y ago

   Thank you for the smart questions. We are focused on a specific market of midsize employers (frequently self-insured). Our goal is to help employees of our clients navigate the full point of healthcare in a way that is scalable. Many compan
6. 6.▲
   by anmaslak 9y ago

   Hey everyone - Nate Maslak (Nate #2) here! Excited to get your feedback on the product and answer any questions you might have.