andrerm

10 ms·

31.
by andrerm 7y ago
Why worry? Facebook's Privacy Police says they value our privacy. And Neuralink's home page doesn't even have a Privacy Police. And Neuralink's paper [1] doesn't even mention the word privacy once. My point is, we w
32.
by andrerm 7y ago
And don't forget FBI is the one pushing against encryption
33.
by andrerm 7y ago
Google is a US corporation. It doesn't matters
34.
by andrerm 7y ago
Almost 5 years after uBlock's fork and now that Google is ready to kill ad blockers as we know and like them. Well, good job
35.
by andrerm 7y ago
> Content Viewing Information includes things like the title of the content, actions taken while viewing the content, and the length of time you viewed it. But may or may not include other "things" you will never know. > we
36.
by andrerm 7y ago
> we need to ask ourselves whether the future society we want to live in is one which constantly watches its citizens – or, more likely, one in which citizens are never totally sure when, how and by whom they’re being watched. First, dig
37.
by andrerm 7y ago
This is a step in the right direction but it is so generic that it basically corroborates everything that is being done today. Is basically says to big tech co: keep up with the good work. What we need is laws like this: opt-in is mandator
38.
by andrerm 7y ago
> The machine doesn’t have the discernment or common sense that the human touch has. July 12, 2007, Baghdad airstrike ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_12,_2007,_Baghdad_airst... ) Edit: add title to link
39.
by andrerm 7y ago
> Applications should respect OS configured settings. Why does everybody misses that part?
40.
by andrerm 7y ago
> i. Consumers should also have the opportunity to make choices with respect to the sale of personal data to non-affiliated third parties. > ii. Consumers should understand under what circumstances their decision to opt-out (or not o
41.
by andrerm 7y ago
Android + Chrome + DoH + AMP = ? Edit: typo
42.
by andrerm 7y ago
Mozilla I don't know but Google is already doing it with AMP
43.
by andrerm 7y ago
This is misleading to the point it's almost propaganda. From Facebooks announcement [1] > ... if you’re in a photo and are part of the audience for that post, we’ll notify you, even if you haven’t been tagged. You’re in control of y
44.
by andrerm 7y ago
Google knows and logs forever every app you start on your device doesn't matter if installed from Google Play or not.
45.
by andrerm 7y ago
> We can’t let that happen: allowing e-mail to be fully controlled by a small set of cooperating multi-million users hosts is just accepting to be screwed. I agree but don't say it isn't hard. It's hard and it's not f
46.
by andrerm 7y ago
> This is probably the biggest weakness of the system, and the part that’s driving the “backdoor’ concerns above. You see, the HSMs Apple uses are programmable. This means that — as long as Apple still has the code signing keys — the com
47.
by andrerm 7y ago
And Postifx is not just one thing, it's: smtp, smtps, submission, relay etc... And Dovecot: pop3, pop3s, imap, imaps, lmtp, passdb, userdb, sql, ldap, seive etc. Look, I don't want Google changing this tomorrow because to somethin
48.
by andrerm 7y ago
> all on device and do not transmit out Like Apple? Retorical question. My point is: this stays in device is just propaganda. It can be done but will never happen
49.
by andrerm 7y ago
I have conserns about privacy pass protocol. Can't the server abuse the protocol? What if sT is always 2T? For the record, I don't like captcha. About fingerprinting "budget", asking users for consent is useless to pro
50.
by andrerm 7y ago
“I’m sensitive to it,” >Speicher said. “I don’t know the scale or scope at this point in time but I don’t see it as being fundamentally different than our other experiments in the sense of ensuring that we can evaluate the tech without a
51.
by andrerm 7y ago
Great, a giant WebAssembly blob reading and writing my files. What could go wrong?
52.
by andrerm 7y ago
> Consent by the user Like Android permissions hell? Why do Google do this kind of things? Can't they see it's not worth it? How could my 12 years old daughter understand that her farm, barbie or chicken whatever don't nee
53.
by andrerm 7y ago
> users will be able to opt in Would you help make Siri better? Yes|No
54.
by andrerm 7y ago
> users will be able to opt in Would you help make Siri better? Yes|No
55.
by andrerm 7y ago
> the widespread creation and spread of data is inherent to computers and the Internet It is not. It is that way because we developed software to he that way Edit: I don't beleave in absolute privacy, we never had that, but Ibdo thi
56.
by andrerm 7y ago
Why do you think Google is indexing all your online purchases? Look, online tracking inevitably leads to behavioral profiling. Put two behavioral profiles side by side and you have scoring, ranking. Add some weight on behaviors, age, income
57.
by andrerm 7y ago
URL are limited to 1000 charactes
58.
by andrerm 7y ago
We, the ones who fully understans how technology works, must stand in favor of the ones who don't and can't make a truly informed decision when using technology. Tech companies must stop the dark patterns, information obfuscation
59.
by andrerm 7y ago
It is not surprising and it is how it works today but people don't fully understand it and can't make a truly infirmed decision. We, the ones who truly understand both sides if this, must stand in favor of the ones who don't.
60.
by andrerm 7y ago
But the IRMA QR code generator server is decentralized too?

More ›