andoando

53 ms·

781.
by andoando 3y ago
I disagree. I dont see any reason users wouldn't equally share the risk if neither party did anything wrong. I suppose if the company makes a claim like "We wont share your data with anyone" then you could make that point
782.
by andoando 3y ago
To simplify what youre saying - I think its just a matter of opposites/differences. Music is a pattern of differences. You can take any two things that are different and create a pattern, a rhythm and humans will find it interesting to
783.
by andoando 3y ago
Can you explain more? What do you mean the data isnt there?
784.
by andoando 3y ago
So Im guessing non western music still still satisfies other mathematical relationships? I dont think it's correct to say the mathematical explanation is incorrect or even limited. Even considering deviations/slight variations fro
785.
by andoando 3y ago
Yeah I found the same thing, does anyone have an explanation for that?
786.
by andoando 3y ago
That is in fact what quantum physics showed.
787.
by andoando 3y ago
I dont think thats correct. Any change on a lower level will effect the greater cell. Each cells behavior is the composition of all its lower cells after all. Im sure there are various compositions that lead to the same outcome, so it shoul
788.
by andoando 3y ago
So I understand how the classical ML classification/regression works. I can see how if you applied the same method to each word you can produce sentences. "Dogs are" -> "animals that..." Where Im confused is how
789.
by andoando 3y ago
Its the universe! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ycvlJ9XMd94&pp=ygUWc2ltcHNvbnM...
790.
by andoando 3y ago
I think he meant it in the sense that its a mutation that propagates indefinitely. But yeah its a loose analogy.
791.
by andoando 3y ago
I suppose in a sense it would. Would be really interesting to explore that with different input values and see what happens. I imagine some changes would result in the whole thing eventually collapsing and others would maybe get self correc
792.
by andoando 3y ago
Few thoughts: 1. What happens if we artificially change the value for a cell? I imagine it would ensue chaos and the changes would eventually propagate to every level. Would love to see this. 2. Would it be possible to have each cell be a d
793.
by andoando 3y ago
Stock prices change continuously based on the current price and future events that have not happened. I don't think they are at all predictable.
794.
by andoando 3y ago
Considering GPT can do programming and logic to some level, I assume it has has training of that sort? It can seem to do logic even on some completely made up abstract notions. For example "Consider a jumajambi has 2 jimimis. Each jimi
795.
by andoando 3y ago
Chain of thought in itself is pretty simple. We had logical provers in the 50s. The difficulty imo is how "thought" is modeled. Pure logic is too rigorous, and pure statistics is too inconsistent.
796.
by andoando 3y ago
I think a fundamental difference is we are able to learn new things by reasoning through our existing knowledge. Moreover our beliefs are mostly consistent with each other, and we can be argued with and have our beliefs changed. As far as I
797.
by andoando 3y ago
Im with you. My only understanding of ML is a class in 2016 where we implemented basic ML algos and not neutral nets, gpts or whatever but I always assumed its no radically different. Take a bunch of features or make up a billion features,
798.
by andoando 3y ago
Not strictly speaking of ML, but you can pretend to understand by having a giant map of questions to answers, but unable to infer an answer to a new question.
799.
by andoando 3y ago
I ended up reading that whole thing, but by digital fingerprint I meant something like embedding a cryptographic checksum in an image. Or some way of proving an image is produced by a specific camera. Itd be great for example if we could ve
800.
by andoando 3y ago
Right exactly, much like p hacking with studies. Publish enough research papers and you get significant results by chance, and it gets into a headline as "Science shows..." and people believe it. Unfortunately in this space the am
801.
by andoando 3y ago
I was thinking about this the other day. The issue is if you have an imperfect test to detect fakes, it gives even more credibility to fakes that pass the test. If there are no tests however, then were left to question the validity of every
802.
by andoando 3y ago
I think the interesting discussion here is as you're putting it, consciousness, the subjective experience of living and feeling. These are not requirements for intelligence or any physical process, and yet it is an indisputable fact th
803.
by andoando 3y ago
I would love an explanation for software enginners / CS majors who aren't familiar with ML. Last I studied ML was 2016 and that was stuff like decision trees, k nearest neighbors...
804.
by andoando 3y ago
Im confused, how does probability help here when you need to encode the possibility of all legal moves?
805.
by andoando 3y ago
I certainly don't. I see so many scientific/philosophical issues with it, and Im surprised anyone takes it seriously.
806.
by andoando 3y ago
What did they disprove? Or at least, what field of study?
807.
by andoando 3y ago
I would have added umms and hmms artificially just to make the latency less apparent, so Id say good chance thats what they did lol
808.
by andoando 3y ago
just add a hmmm before every response
809.
by andoando 3y ago
Its impossible to induce anything through compression alone as it is reductory. We also need the ability to add and combine things. The vary nature of the inquiry of physics is to find the simplest mental conception which explains the great
810.
by andoando 3y ago
There is a similar product called Sweep AI thst I tried. For extremely simple things "like add a button to the page that prints hello" it was very good. I then asked it to do something more complex, which was to render my d3.js gr

More ›