Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ambulancechaser
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
the authors cite Matija Pretnar who has an introduction on [algebraic effects]( http://www.eff-lang.org/handlers-tutorial.pdf ). I'm reading through it now as I have no idea what is going on :)
62.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
that's very uncharitable. This person has a PhD in mathematics and has done some studying in the field. This is their own personal opinion of the matter after a firsthand experience.
63.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
> a study showing 99% of NFL players had chronic brain issues (Cte) Just to quibble but I understood that the study revealed that 99% of the group inspected had CTE. The group was not intended to be cross-section of the general populati
64.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
the broadcast system is certainly helpful if less than all cars have it. The proposal estimates the cost per car at 100-300 dollars. > Seems pricy when Tesla has a system today that solves this problem without all that infrastructure, o
65.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
The ID is a randomly generated 4 byte integer. This is obviously not identifying for law enforcement. I don't know about the certificates if they could be identifying but I'm not seeing a way to track down an owner or operator fro
66.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
It seems as anonymous as current highway usage and vision. You can see a car while they are within eye-sight. In this proposal, your car can receive data about the other car while they are within about 300m. Once gone they are gone. I'
67.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
> Would eliminating the ID component of the proposal satisfy the critics? I'm not a critic and I have no idea. As to the rest, just about everything we do in interaction has an ID. This comment will have an ID. I as a hacker news us
68.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
I think you've got your causation backwards; this is what will allow for widespread autonomous adoption. This proposal is making sure that all cars are speaking the same language and are talking to each other. I look at this as the Fed
69.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
You seem surprised, but this is an indicator that you're not reading a good article. They are covering something and don't even accurately describe the proposal by NHTSA. But thankfully they link to the proposal itself. So here&#x
70.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
well, presumably this ruling restores the Redskins trademark to the football team, and certainly the Justices would know this. since the majority of this organization is not presumably Native American, your question isn't speculative b
71.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
> At least the ones who talk about why they quit stick to their own experiences > I myself have no issues with the social network, I keep up with friends, family and it isn't a time suck for me anymore than HN.
72.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
> But what about content providers who aren't so happy about unauthorized clips There is no way that netflix will jeopardize their distribution licenses for a few gifs. Anything that comes from it is no doubt cleared and above board
73.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
someone mentioned it earlier but it's not true that cdr always returns a list, for instance, `(cdr `(1 . 2))`
74.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
but you're not passing it the argument '(1 2). Lisps are usually (always?) strict evaluation, so the form `(list 1 2)` or `(quote (1 2))` would return the form (1 2). First applied to this form would return 1. The specification is
75.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
these suits are filed in federal district courts as far as I can tell. State law won't be controlling on the issues there.
76.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
I'm not sure that your point makes sense. If Microsoft insists on backwards compatibility, then you _can_ upgrade with "no worries". This policy seems to encourage people to upgrade as the new OS will honor the old mechanisms
77.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
9y ago
oyez.org will have the votes. Justice Thomas dissented and Justice Alito concurred in the result but not in the argument. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/581/15-1256/ is the opinion, h
78.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
You're advocating for the flight crew to instruct a passenger to relinquish their seat after they have already sat in it so that a first class customer could have it? I think it's safe to say that that should be an action of last
79.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
They bumped a rich guy in this instance. I'm not sure how this can amount to a "frontal assault on human dignity" by asking a dude to relinquish his seat when there's a conflict. They had too many people in first class a
80.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
> If the police didn't know who was wrong The police won't arbitrate a civil matter. > they could asked the airline to cancel the flight and seek damages in a court. Then, and only then, they could remove anyone from the pla
81.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
I believe this is correct. If there is a civil argument, it can be heard in an appropriate venue. But once the owner/operator of an FAA regulated aircraft has asked you to leave you no longer have any recourse and the word of the airpl
82.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
> He had a legitimate reason not to give up his seat This is true until an officer of the law asked him to get off the plane. Argument time happens before that, and after that in court. But at that point, you're being ordered off a
83.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
I think you missed the point of the post you are responding to. That person understands the value of the bug, and is just pointing out that Rust runs with unchecked math in production and would therefore be just as vulnerable in production.
84.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
Is this a pessimistic view of Facebook or of people?
85.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
i'm not sure where you are correcting the person you are responding to. It all seems consistent to me.
86.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
> why python???? ... any language with functions will do. it will. and this person chose python. > HN please prove me wrong in an objective way so we may all learn? no one cares about the choice of language. This is about learning alg
87.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
just want to point out that your link explicitly refutes your statement. They are not illegal and you linked to a test about legality of unpaid internships: > There are some circumstances under which individuals who participate in “for-p
88.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
that documentation is insufficient to describe what integer 1.5 rounds to. There are two equidistant integers. So what do you expect in this case and what does it do, and how could you expect it to do one or the other in this case based on
89.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
clojure is close, but not done on Github. All work must be through jira/bitbucket but anyone can sign up for free with the only requirement is of a CA.
90.
▲
by
ambulancechaser
10y ago
Someone already replied, but this is exactly opposite what happened as stated. The US government wanted access to only one particular user. The infrastructure did not allow this, and the guy behind Lavabit objected because a single key regu
More ›