well, presumably this ruling restores the Redskins trademark to the football team, and certainly the Justices would know this. since the majority of this organi

well, presumably this ruling restores the Redskins trademark to the football team, and certainly the Justices would know this. since the majority of this organization is not presumably Native American, your question isn't speculative but is directly answered: they hold the the infringement of free speech cannot be justified.