alttab

62 ms·

601.
by alttab 12y ago
Ever think for one moment that a mobile RTS has a different use case and different market than someone who plays Starcraft 2? Don't you think there are more of "those people", than those that will be annoyed with week build t
602.
by alttab 12y ago
The only way I could see it working is if you could easily send an integrated experience to a user who does not have the app. This would need to be from the web, have access to the camera, or ultimately download and install the app in the b
603.
by alttab 12y ago
So I won't knock on you enjoying it, because thats subjective. How do you use it though, you'll need to eventually sell all your facebook friends to use it as well since you like it so much. You'll have to convince them why f
604.
by alttab 12y ago
Or download your stupid fucking app in the first place.
605.
by alttab 12y ago
Just like Snapchat's pictures were temporary?
606.
by alttab 12y ago
I hate Facebook status update anxiety. Some days I never leave my house.
607.
by alttab 12y ago
and then send me a blank picture so you can see the one I sent for you. This way, a picture exchange requires at least 3 pictures. Seems like a win for usability to me. /s
608.
by alttab 12y ago
If Facebook is doing it, its a clever way to do something to help them serve you ads.
609.
by alttab 12y ago
Why the hell would sending dud pictures to see a picture someone sent you be "normal" for the app? Couldn't we use Facebook, Snapchat, or SMS to get the same effect without literally working around a feature? Fucking retarded
610.
by alttab 12y ago
Same here. Its like sharing, but you have to share to let people share. Seems fucking stupid. Sending a picture is essentially asking for a picture. I can't imagine enough use cases where I think "I'll definitely want to send
611.
by alttab 12y ago
Its definitely because they are taking naked pictures of themselves.
612.
by alttab 12y ago
That isn't scammy. In these sorts of RTS games there are build times. Its special to not wait on those. Remember the cheat code everylittlethingshedoes in WarCraft II? How is buying access to that scammy? You don't have to buy it
613.
by alttab 12y ago
Human-reviewing the "scamminess" of an IAP at Appstore scale would be a complete disaster. Every reviewer would have to understand the full dynamics of the game before improperly labelling an IAP as scammy. Its impractical to thin
614.
by alttab 12y ago
Not getting molested comes at a price: $85 for pre-check status. That said, you also have to hand over your social media history and web browsing history. Its required for your KTN.
615.
by alttab 12y ago
Can they be? No, they are programmers. Can they become? More interesting question!
616.
by alttab 12y ago
Isn't the whole stink about Amazon is that they keep the customers for themselves? Amazon knows how to profit from data without sending it anywhere, it would seem. They would have little motive in sharing that info with anyone. I can&#
617.
by alttab 12y ago
It would also be interesting to see the volume that produced a %15 uptake. That's not statistically significant as a number in itself. Also, enough things seemed to have changed at once that its hard to measure what the true impact of
618.
by alttab 12y ago
If anything, it highlights the insensitivity. Its not that its debatable based on nuance that it was his girlfriend, all girlfriends, or all women. The point is, women got offended. If the industry was sensitive to this, they wouldn'
619.
by alttab 12y ago
Which isn't exposing Objective-C to a wide range of engineers in the industry to the point people and relate and swap horror stories about it.
620.
by alttab 12y ago
To be fair, Objective C hasn't run billion dollar companies for decades yet either (in mass).
621.
by alttab 12y ago
I never said consumers have access to a free market. I'm saying access to a free market would help solve the issue.
622.
by alttab 12y ago
Ctrl+J; $('.blockUI').remove();
623.
by alttab 12y ago
The next use you described came from yourself. The rest of the thread is emerging with a consistent theme, "what are your customers saying?"
624.
by alttab 12y ago
Unlike others, I understood the problem. Your true problem is unless this web agency is cranking out landing pages for a living - your customer will probably spend more time getting your tool integrated than working with it. And they cease
625.
by alttab 12y ago
Prefetching the URL will trash analytics, which is why most of this is really done. Its not like the short URLs are easier to copy/paste, or remember.
626.
by alttab 12y ago
I feel like this is a small move for Apple. They are trying to carve out their niche in an application space that is immensely smaller than the iPod, iPad, and iPhone markets. If I was an investor, I'd be worried about these new framew
627.
by alttab 12y ago
Sure, but it provides more features than headroom.js.
628.
by alttab 12y ago
Why an entire js dependency for what can be accomplished with 10 lines of jquery?
629.
by alttab 12y ago
This is fairly balanced. A good read. What many people seem not to understand is the government control of information. The free market is really the only true way to handle this.
630.
by alttab 12y ago
I find reading books and tutorials pale in comparison to battle experience. Reading a book three times only gets you so far - battling rake for a number of hours about gem conflicts and you learn quite a bit...

More ›