albedoa

37 ms·

511.
by albedoa 7y ago
Right, we agree on that, but the above comment lumps all of what you describe (“betting with a weak hand”) under “bluffing” and says the bot learns that it makes more money when its opponent folds.
512.
by albedoa 7y ago
> You want your opponent to fold more often than not when you have thin value because more often than not you’re actually beat. No, that is simply not true. If I am betting for value, then I want my opponent to call no matter how weak I
513.
by albedoa 7y ago
> when it bets with a weak hand, the opponent (another copy of itself) sometimes folds and it makes more money than if it hadn't bet. This makes no sense. If I am betting for thin value with a weak hand, then I make less money whe
514.
by albedoa 7y ago
> How often do you think this happens within 2 miles from your house? How often do I think what happens? I live in Boston. So depending on what you are asking, the answer is probably too damn often, which is the point. See: https:&#
515.
by albedoa 7y ago
Your one example incident involved a stopped school bus and the death of a child back in 2009. That you recall the result as being extraordinary ten years later should reenforce the representation.
516.
by albedoa 7y ago
You're allowed to comment on posts in that thread. It's nice to read different perspectives about the hiring process and what it's like to work for these companies (like we are getting in this thread). You can also ask and re
517.
by albedoa 7y ago
A much simpler solution is to keep visiting them.
518.
by albedoa 7y ago
You've imagined what it would be like to live in a parking space if it were to remain one of a block or a row of parking spaces. I don't think that's the point being made.
519.
by albedoa 7y ago
This thread is not about a voluntary payment, and we don’t typically get to choose which laws we consent to. So I don’t know what you are asking.
520.
by albedoa 7y ago
> Who pays it? Who collects it? My only guess is that you misunderstand what is being proposed. The spammer is not part of the transaction.
521.
by albedoa 7y ago
You're just prompting the original question again.
522.
by albedoa 7y ago
> I see the same issue on Instagram for very specific issues you cannot report profiles. It came up recently that in order to report an imposter account, you have to tag the person who the account is impersonating. So if that person does
523.
by albedoa 8y ago
> Your scenario doesn't reflect how Brave's model works at all Because he didn't exclude first-party ads? That's what you consider to be not reflective "at all"? Just pretend he said "all non-Adsense th
524.
by albedoa 8y ago
Can you link to the comment of yours that I replied to? I can't see it for some reason.
525.
by albedoa 8y ago
The whole video was him explaining why the image would look the way it ended up looking. darkpuma was overly patient when explaining this to you.
526.
by albedoa 8y ago
You truly believe that all of the downvotes on all of your comments are the work of one account?
527.
by albedoa 8y ago
> I can imagine the Mona Lisa, but not really the full image, just more like a sense of the painting How do you think this compares to those who don't have aphantasia? How do they imagine the Mona Lisa?
528.
by albedoa 8y ago
Over the parent dictating? No, I wouldn't worry about it.
529.
by albedoa 8y ago
Also, flexbox allows a child element to center itself using `margin: auto;`: https://codepen.io/anon/pen/gyLGwW
530.
by albedoa 8y ago
Here is a section of the OP in Chrome on macOS with no CSS applied: https://i.imgur.com/AGzy98D.png I am not in a position to doubt your stated preference, but certainly "it looks rather good to me" does not block
531.
by albedoa 8y ago
The flushing of pickles down your toilet was probably going to cause problems before any rehydration concerns.
532.
by albedoa 8y ago
> it is about tenants rights, not visitors of tenants. That link is not the best. Quiet Enjoyment does cover the tenant's right to have visitors. A landlord cannot interfere with that right, including by blocking access to the uni
533.
by albedoa 8y ago
Surprise! Not only was Elway being misleading, he was also admitting to complicity: https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/john-elway-blames-colin-k... > Not that it was hard to find: you can easily fire up a searc
534.
Is Wall Construction at the National Butterfly Center About to Begin?(audubon.org)
2 points by albedoa 8y ago|0 comments
535.
by albedoa 8y ago
Instacart have been playing these games for years now [1]. They're not going to stop. They will squeeze their contractors until they meet resistance, then issue an apology and repeat. There are no long-term consequences, or at least an
536.
by albedoa 8y ago
For one thing, a significant portion of it is completely wrong, which makes the sibling comment by yakshaving_jgt particularly rich.
537.
by albedoa 8y ago
> there's no guarantee that the producer of the software you're depending on is actually adhering to that contract That goes right back to "but neither is the system it replaces". I would rather know that an overzealo
538.
by albedoa 8y ago
Yes, we know what you are arguing. And if auto-responders are yet another vector for an org, then it does not represent a meaningful increase in risk.
539.
by albedoa 8y ago
Because those companies would be in less of a position to have the effects described in the original reply. I would like to help you more, but I don’t know what is confusing.
540.
by albedoa 8y ago
There is no mention of such a benefit in the comment you are replying to. The point is that the qualifiers you applied in your original comment should be less worrisome than their opposites, which is not to say that they shouldn't be w

More ›