albedoa

35 ms·

541.
by albedoa 8y ago
Which element of each do you think is being compared?
542.
by albedoa 8y ago
To be clear, you believe that in this hypothetical only the rich would be able to afford to drive but the jobs and their employees would remain 20 miles from each other.
543.
by albedoa 8y ago
You will want to read this before applying to SimpliSafe: https://digboston.com/macro-aggressions-trump-flags-right-wi...
544.
by albedoa 8y ago
> Unmigrated semver breaking changes are a form of technical debt Maybe you can clear my confusion. If Module B is dependent on Module A, then every version of B should refer to a specific version of A, correct? What is there to break? D
545.
by albedoa 8y ago
It is a coincidence. Legitimate operations are not spoofing their numbers in the first place, whereas spoofers have shown themselves to be dishonest by spoofing. So you are not being removed from any spam lists using this method. Not only d
546.
by albedoa 8y ago
Come on, man. Stop posting these conspiracy videos around this thread. They really don't have a place here.
547.
by albedoa 8y ago
> I mean that's like saying Star Wars isn't a reliable source; you're judging something on the basis of something it isn't meant to be in the first place. You described the channel as "pretty good at covering the
548.
by albedoa 8y ago
> You'd have to transfer that at some point. Why do you say that? The point is that you do not transfer it.
549.
by albedoa 8y ago
> Nobody in the US expects this - and in fact, it's rare that this even happens. At most the server will "interrupt" you once once your food arrives to check in, and even that varies by restaurant. I live in the North East
550.
by albedoa 8y ago
One was also the author of the fake NSA Heartbleed exploit story, which Bloomberg stood by: https://twitter.com/nicoleperlroth/status/104901890298483507...
551.
by albedoa 8y ago
dang, the guy is adamantly denying the definition of a well-known word. That behavior can be shut down without resorting to “both sides-ism”. Don’t use me as the tat to his tit.
552.
by albedoa 8y ago
> That quote is a product of its time, and only seems foolish or misguided with the benefit of hindsight. "Only"? There were top-level comments in that very thread [1] that pointed out why it was misguided and foolish. Hindsi
553.
by albedoa 8y ago
Again, we know what words mean. We know where choices come from. That has nothing to do with and is frankly a strange deflection from your ongoing confusion about the words you use. Which is more likely: That you don't know what a wo
554.
by albedoa 8y ago
You twice attached it to the noun "choice" but you were actually referring to a power? Sounds believable.
555.
by albedoa 8y ago
It isnt exceptional to ask for a source, no need for sarcasm. It is exceptional to expect or require sources for well-known ideas to be attached to every comment that alludes to or evokes them. None of us needed sources to understand the
556.
by albedoa 8y ago
Yes, we know what it means. If you had applied the adjective to power or a ruling body, then you would have shown to as well.
557.
by albedoa 8y ago
It's an arbitrary choice in the sense that plenty of people enjoy and rely on headphone jacks and that the benefits of switching aren't exactly major. That's still not what arbitrary means.
558.
by albedoa 8y ago
He is not suggesting features, he is reporting an issue. It would be great if this site did not break keyboard navigation :)
559.
by albedoa 8y ago
the left also chastises Sheldon Adelson, who is also jewish. I'm trying to connect this with the words preceding it. Do you think the left chastises Adelson for anti-Semitic reasons?
560.
by albedoa 8y ago
Ah, there it is.
561.
by albedoa 8y ago
If an honest conversation relies on you understanding the legitimate reasons why we don't listen to what James Woods has to say, then what are the odds of an honest conversation?
562.
by albedoa 8y ago
Hm? Did you mean to reply to me? I am not challenging or even talking about the definition of pink. That is happening elsewhere in this thread.
563.
by albedoa 8y ago
It is unclear what your suspicions are. You capitalized a bunch of words and concluded with "Total fraudsters". Can you tell us your specific issues with the studies?
564.
by albedoa 8y ago
> Pink is not "light red". No adjustment of the saturation of red will ever make it pink. Can you tell us what you think one has to do with the other?
565.
by albedoa 8y ago
That function call is an alias for: map-get(map-get($palettes, 'blue'), light) Which, in a language with dot accessors, could be accessed like: $palette.blue.light I don't think he means that the function call is odd but rath
566.
by albedoa 8y ago
Hey man, it looks like you are trolling all of my comments from days ago because I once noted that you had changed the entire text of one of your comments after it had already received replies. This behavior of yours is weird and obsessive.
567.
by albedoa 8y ago
Nobody knows who you are.
568.
by albedoa 8y ago
Be straight with us, is that really how you read his story?
569.
by albedoa 8y ago
I realize you asked about people in general and not Howell himself, but he said[1] almost exactly that about his product: Well, no I didn't [write something worthy of Google]. I wrote a simple package manager. Anyone could write one.
570.
by albedoa 8y ago
Your interpretation of the comment you are replying to is far from generous and from what our standard should be.

More ›