alabaster_punt

4 ms·

1.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
Further to my original comment, as you can see, bringing this up results in your comment being flagged while other users freely go about spreading racist rhetoric. Just a few days ago I had a "discussion" with a user who drew an e
2.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
Do you see how absurd it is to present an anti-racist slogan and a racist slogan as equivalent? Your logical contortions require the removal of all context from the discussion. Context is important. In this case, the context is that the ove
3.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and congratulate you on falling for the con.
4.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
I have to wonder why you're so determined to defend a phrase coined by neo-nazis, used by the Ku Klux Klan and other known white nationalists, and whether or not you have a bias of your own.
5.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
One of them was a reaction to a well-evidenced trend of excessive police force against black people. The other one is literally a neo-nazi dog whistle intended to promote the theory that there is a conspiracy against white people in western
6.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
Are you suggesting "It's OK to be white" isn't a dogwhistle?
7.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
> Has it? I'm not really sure how you came to this conclusion. I explained in the comment you replied to. You seem to be deliberately ignoring that people who are not predisposed to the viewpoint could also be exposed. I do not beli
8.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
If you have a specific reason to believe that the model resulted in an incorrect conclusion, feel free to share it, instead of casting aspersions with cryptic nothings.
9.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
> Which is why it's important that we present the truth right next to it, so people don't have to look elsewhere. This still assumes that people will be willing to watch it. > Well, it is available, in places where the truth
10.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
What's dangerous about it is that it's encouraging people to demand that their government enact policies that will lead to unnecessary deaths. Neil Ferguson's model was not flawed (at least, not in a significant way that woul
11.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
Sakora is the latter, and the problem with this viewpoint is publishing the truth elsewhere doesn't stop people from absorbing the lies here. Somebody consuming this content is not likely to seek out alternative viewpoints to correct t
12.
by alabaster_punt 6y ago
Hardly surprising that a video full of dangerous misinformation has been pulled. It would be worth reading about this particular professor on Wikipedia, particularly his support for alternative medicine, his false claim to have been a profe