agentofoblivion

10 ms·

31.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
What is the point of your comment? Are you here to say, “just so you know, Chesa and his policies are actually good, it’s the cops that are bad”?
32.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Rich people? Lol. At least people are transparently saying their hateful nonsense these days. Yes, it’s people with large incomes that are making people take fentanyl, shit on the streets and stab people to death. If only rent was 50% chea
33.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
English is my first (and only) language and I’ve never heard of this. I would say that it not only doesn’t sound weird, but is totally normal. Who told you this isn’t correct?
34.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
That all looks erotic.
35.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
I’m confused—you’re claiming the above are radical leftist policies? They seem like (mostly bad) moderate left policies to me. Here are things I think are radical, and my gauge for that is asking if it could reasonably appear on a BLM dema
36.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Really? So there isn’t open and pervasive drug use? All these videos of herds of people robbing stores, and homeless people straight up saying they can use/sell drugs and commit petty theft without consequence are just lying?
37.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
They are one and the same. Chesa Boudine was largely responsible, and ran on the platform, of essentially not enforcing laws on drugs and theft. His parents spent decades in prison for murder as a result of their radical leftists activism w
38.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Are you being serious? SF is as much, or more, known for radical left wing politics than it is tech. They basically give homeless people free money, make it legally hard to clear camps, and don’t enforce laws of open, hard drug use and pet
39.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
One question that’s always top of mind when I hear about the insanity of SF: why on Earth are people with radical, proven ineffective policies voted in time and time again? Whenever I hear from tech people, they think it’s crazy. So if tec
40.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
I don’t think that’s quite right. Lower classes also have debt, and inflation effectively reduces your debt. In that case, it’s a direct transfer of wealth from lenders to debtors.
41.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Anyone that has paid any attention to ChatGPT, or LLMs in general, knows that this is absolutely par for the course. There’s no reliability that you get correct answers with current training methods. They are optimized to create plausible (
42.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Yes, you’re right and I’ve been obscene and annoying. I’m sorry. I have kids and know many parents. I think it’s odd to use these ancillary reasons as motivations for having kids because the change to your life is so huge and profound (and
43.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Sweet reason! Any thought to the human life you’ll create, or the enormous amounts of personal responsibility that will ensue?
44.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
What “data driven” normally looks like: business people ask questions that are not answerable, but the DS team often goes off and tries to answer them anyway. I’ve been in so many meetings, in multiple organizations, where a senior leader a
45.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Oh, you should have kids to solve your social problems then!
46.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
I don’t recommend the kids one. You might get to talk to some people, but only about kids, and only in 10 second intervals before being interrupted by said kids. Also, when you go back home, you still have to take care of them.
47.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
How? Stable Diffusion v1 uses, for example, the off the shelf CLIP model. The hard part is getting the dataset and something that’s functional, and then the community takes over and optimizes like hell to make it way smaller and faster at
48.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
You could have written this exact same post, and been wrong, about text2img until Stable Diffusion came along.
49.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
No, that’s not the argument. I’m calling out your false comparison that positions it as if modern tech workers are in some sort of proletarian struggle against their oppressors. I’m sorry if being in one of the most lucrative and cushy jobs
50.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Barf!!!! To compare a 2023 Google employee to any population that’s had “boot stomping on their faces” is so out of touch with historical reality that it’s disturbing, disgusting and laughable all at the same time. We’re not talking about
51.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
He seems like the slimiest CEO imaginable. I have no data to back this up, just his constant woke clamoring, before woke dominated the culture, and the way he looks. My gut just instantly sets off alarm bells.
52.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
I recently spoke at a conference, and had some interested audience members approach me after to discuss more. One said he really valued the content and asked if I had published a paper outlining the same. I replied that I had not, but I did
53.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
+1. I’ve been here almost 6 years and across 3 different teams. Never seen any of the horrors.
54.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
I think the point is that it’s hard to scale this. I’ve worked in the fraud space for awhile and a big problem is sophisticated actors that scale their operation and cause a lot of damage. If you can make it more expensive to scale, you can
55.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
I would be cautious about going down this road. For context, I have YT channel with >12k subscribers that is also for technical content. When I was similarly early on, I found myself in a similar place, thinking a lot about growth and
56.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Yes, I have. Just learned about these recently. Pretty sweet!
57.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
There’s only one way to fix this mess. Leave.
58.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
Mandating remote work? You have terrible ideas.
59.
by agentofoblivion 4y ago
There is plenty in this article that is just wrong. 1. GNNs are no more "sequential" than CNNs and are therefore just as parallelizable in this respect (caveat below). A single GNN layer simply aggregates the features of the conn
60.
Basics of Graph Neural Networks(graphneuralnets.com)
4 points by agentofoblivion 4y ago|0 comments

More ›