Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
adnzzzzZ
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
It's not any more crazy than people committing actual violence in real life, like murdering someone, and only getting properly arrested months later after an investigation has taken place. Somehow we've managed to survive with tha
92.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
This is nothing but the Paradox of Tolerance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance in action. Intolerant websites shouldn't be tolerated in our society.
93.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
This thread is talking about an example of doxxing on a much larger scale than anything that has ever happened on 4chan. What's your point?
94.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Pretty obviously "domestic terrorists" https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/status/1348497645531226112 , who seeing what's happening will likely actually engage in some domestic terrorism, and thus the
95.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
President Trump supported the Capitol -protests-, not the invasaion. The media has worked very hard to conflate the two. Nobody wants our institutional buildings to be invaded. That was also a general and very peaceful invasion, not people
96.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
What's gross is people defending the burning down of small businesses during a pandemic. Either way, reasonable people who don't defend violence in either case are irrelevant, because things happen through violence regardless. Wha
97.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Facts don't exist when we're talking about politics and power. If you believe they do you have a hopelessly naive view of the world. But I'm similarly not going to spend time lecturing you about it.
98.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Wrong. They came to the same conclusion at the same time because their side of the battle finally won and now they can punish their enemies safely. That's all there is to it. Anything else is a rationalization. In the future if the oth
99.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
There are articles from "real institutions" saying it is him, for example: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-04-07/michael-b... . It wouldn't surprise me that it is him, he seems like
100.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Your claim that people learning to play the game "effectively removes the benefit" of procgen content is false. Games like Spelunky are played by people for much longer than the average indie game precisely because the process of
101.
▲
Borders vs. No Borders
(a327ex.substack.com)
3 points
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
|
0 comments
102.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
I agree with you! The way the police acts is often awful and overly broad. I'm all for diminishing their power. But this makes your comment down the thread even more confusing. You said: "He's trying to be clever and say &quo
103.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
>- China mandated masks in January (as did Taiwan). No conspiracy or confusion, that was a US thing... Yes, and the US didn't for a long time because of no supplies. Chinese citizens bought out all masks in January and early Februar
104.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Well, how do you know that 5G doesn't cause Coronavirus when it's February and no one knows anything about the virus? We now know that both subjects are unrelated, but I followed this virus from early January and it took the gener
105.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
>People are being (unknowingly) manipulated and the sheer quantity of misinformation is being mistaken for evidence of truth. This is something you said that I originally replied to. We don't agree on what constitutes truth, so we c
106.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
That's fine. Humanity has survived much bigger problems in the past, and I'm sure we'll be able to get by just fine now. And as an added note, as I personally have no appreciation for democracy, in my opinion anything that di
107.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
>Controversial ones can prove themselves with facts/science. The details matter, but as a rule I disagree with this. Some facts are obvious, like pigs not growing on trees, but others aren't, like climate change. Science has be
108.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
>What is it then, people believe lies because it makes sense to them or because other people lie? Because reality is not so clear cut as "pigs grow on trees". No one is claiming anything as ludicrous as pigs grow on trees in ou
109.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
That depends on the post. For instance, I believe that democracy is a mistake and we should be ruled by an authoritarian king. You probably believe this to be a lie, and that I'm likely being manipulated by social media. But I believe
110.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
If everyone is being manipulated how do you stop misinformation in a fair manner? We can't even agree on what is information and what is misinformation. Surely you understand how stopping misinformation is bad if people can't agre
111.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Maybe people wouldn't so easily believe in alternative narratives if people in power didn't also lie all the time? No one believes in the media anymore for a reason. People don't believe in scientists anymore for a reason. Pe
112.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Democracy also depends on elections not being rigged. There's plenty of credible evidence that things were off this election if you bothered to look into the claims. There's obviously also plenty of false stuff, but that doesn
113.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
If people are unknowingly being manipulated how do you know you aren't being manipulated also? There are plenty of examples of manipulative and fake news coming from both traditional and alternative media.
114.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
I've posted a lot of threads here and you have no control over what people will find controversial or not. If you post a thread and it hits people's nerves it generally happens accidentally. And "profiting off it" is alw
115.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
Thank you for your apology. My religion is very important to me and it really bothers me when people think I care about experts. Universities and other buildings of high density intellectual activity should be thoroughly demolished with tan
116.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
>Perhaps unsurprisingly, they don’t end up with higher average incomes than their peers with light personalities. This is the relevant quote. The article explicitly says "light personalities" have no penalty compared to "d
117.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
A useful breakdown of each trait to me is this one https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5863998_Between_Fac... . Here agreeableness is divided into compassion and politeness. Compassion corresponds to your idea of w
118.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
>Overall, individuals with dark traits engage in more counterproductive work behaviour, such as theft and abusive supervision. Perhaps unsurprisingly, they don’t end up with higher average incomes than their peers with light personalitie
119.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
I don't believe in experts. They have no power to change my mind about any social issue whatsoever. So them saying "this is racist" means nothing to me. There is no cognitive dissonance. You're projecting it into me beca
120.
▲
by
adnzzzzZ
6y ago
I don't think we disagree and I don't know why you responded to my comment with this. Even Yarvin himself sort of agrees with you (starting at the Extending Economics section) https://graymirror.substack.com/p/
More ›