3 ms·
I don't think we disagree and I don't know why you responded to my comment with this. Even Yarvin himself sort of agrees with you (starting at the Extending Eco
by adnzzzzZ 6y ago
I don't think we disagree and I don't know why you responded to my comment with this. Even Yarvin himself sort of agrees with you (starting at the Extending Economics section) https://graymirror.substack.com/p/5-the-land-its-people-and-their-dogs https://graymirror.substack.com/p/5-the-land-its-people-and-...
- mempko 6y agoYarvin is terrible. > Its subjects are its assets. Their proprietor’s purpose is to preserve and improve this human capital—hence, salus populi suprema lex. People are people, not assets to some monarch. Sorry, I can't stand behind some backwards 17th century thinking. He is also completely wrong about economics. Economics is not a science that Yarvin thinks it is.