Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
addicted
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
181.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
I don’t see a refutation or even disagreement with the claim in your comment. Are you saying that this is too obvious to restate?
182.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The FBI. The FBI was out for MLK. In his first term Trump liked the FBI so he allowed them to redact the JFK files he was legally supposed to release to the public. But in 2025 they’re his bogey man so releasing it so Kash Patel has an even
183.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Agreed. Trump should never have allowed the redaction of rhe JFK files in 2017 when he was legally bound to release them In the first place.
184.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Yeah, the all so powerful IMF that can be thwarted by the incredibly difficult task of…checks notes…. not taking loans from them… The IMF (or its donor nations) aren’t forcing anyone to take loans from them. Countries do that because the IM
185.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Relevantly, the plant is about to close down because photovoltaics have become so much cheaper than concentrated solar. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/11-years-after-celebrate...
186.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
ByteDance apps are not banned. ByteDance had an opportunity to sell TikTok to any company that isn’t based out of an enemy country that is known to have taken actions against the U.S. and its citizens.
187.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Which cabinet position was Musk appointed to? (In fact, in the U.S. the president doesn’t appoint cabinet members, but sure, you don’t understand the basics of how the govt works but you know what fascism is better than experts who’ve studi
188.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
This is just completely untrue. It’s possible social media could have killed Reader. But Reader died because Google killed anything that wasn’t directly contributing to Google+, and Reader was competition to Google+. Also, I doubt Reader wo
189.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
That’s not how I remember Reader at all. I never used the web interface. Google Reader provided syncing for nearly every 3rd party RSS app. It wasn’t just a walled garden. It was also critical infrastructure for most RSS apps at the time.
190.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The obvious answer is that this user likely also comments on other platforms that do not allow using the word openly and instead of the mental overload of constantly deciding which site does and doesn’t allow spelling out the word they choo
191.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Why don’t you identify all these easily found regulations then? There’s a whole YIMBY movement, for example, that has identified specific regulations that are no longer valid and have made tremendous strides in proving and changing these re
192.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
I’m curious, how many people in your business were elected to their jobs? Do you think people should be electing the ATC agents? Also, what’s your opinion about the entire cabinet, Elon Musk, and the likes, all of whom are also unelected?
193.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
OpenAI itself has argued, to the degree that your analogy applies, that if the goal of stealing the laptop is to train AI then the answer is Yes.
194.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
They probably did to access the NYTimes articles.
195.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
You don’t need a citation. You just need to read OpenAI’s arguments about why TOS and copyright laws don’t apply to them when they’re training on other people’s copyrighted and TOS protected data and running roughshod over every legal prote
196.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The idea that someone can easily replicate an OpenAI model based simply on OpenAI outputs is, I’d argue, immeasurably worse for OpenAI’s valuation than the idea that someone happened to come up with a few innovations that leapfrogged OpenAI
197.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The idea that there was “necessarily a first reasoning being” is neither obvious nor likely. Reasoning could very well have originally been an emergent property of a group of beings. The animal kingdom is full of examples of groups being mo
198.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
This is an incomplete version of OpenAI’s point of view. OpenAI has a legally submitted point of view that they believe the benefits of AI to humanity are so great that anyone creating AI should be allowed to trample all over copyright laws
199.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
It still doesn’t justify their valuation because it shows that their product is unprotectable. In fact, I’d argue this is even worse, because no matter how much OpenAI improves their product, and Altman is prancing around claiming to need $
200.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
It’s even worse because OpenAI took all that information and put it behind a paywall they want to make tons of money with. DeepSeek open sourced it so all of humanity can actually benefit from it.
201.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Nothing to see here. It’s just Oxalate dumping. /s
202.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The team may not have too many PHDs but they are from prestigious universities and have published many papers. The lack of a PhD probably has more to do with the structure of Chinese education but these people were basically studying like P
203.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Space really isn’t that scarce. Library books solely as interior design is still better than 99% of the decorative architecture campuses are covered in that use up orders of magnitude more space.
204.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
Most people don’t get jitters when drinking coffee? I can’t drink coffee because the caffeine affects me terribly but that’s not true for most people.
205.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The headline correctly says they deleted an asteroid because it wasn’t an asteroid. That says nothing about whether or not they continued tracking the object as “not an asteroid”.
206.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
The point is that this was developed outside of OpenAI. So the real question is why does anyone believe that OpenAI will bring AGI when actual innovation was happening in some hedge fund in China while OpenAI was going on an international t
207.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
And the opportunity for a shit ton of lawsuits. Source code like this doesn’t just have no value for Google. It has negative value. It’s a massive liability. That’s why big cos simply bury source code instead of releasing it in the open.
208.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
What you are missing is that it turns out the gold isn’t actually gold. It’s bronze. So earliest, the shovelers were willing to spend thousands of dollars for a single shovel because they were expecting to get much more valuable gold out th
209.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
One only needs to look as far back as the first Trump administration to see that Trump only cares about the announcement and doesn’t care about what’s actually done. And if you don’t want to look that far just lookup what his #1 donor Musk
210.
▲
by
addicted
2y ago
They aren’t even not the best. They’re well below par. For example, Gruber shows that Apple Intelligence which uses ChatGPT, will give the wrong answers for questions which ChatGPT itself is right 100% of the time. It requires effort to be
More ›