ablatt89

12 ms·

61.
by ablatt89 4y ago
It's also scary in that you can extend the premise of knowing the identity of all financial transactions, to anything that obfuscates identity. It wouldn't surprise me if Warren and the other anti-freedom nutters would argue for b
62.
by ablatt89 4y ago
"shall promulgate a rule that prohibits financial institutions from— (1) handling, using, or transacting business with digital asset mixers, privacy coins, and other anonymity-enhancing technologies, as specified by 6 the Secretary&qu
63.
by ablatt89 4y ago
No it does not, bullies and criminals are not seeking to optimize their cash flow. I know this is just for squigees and other petty annoyances, but it's a slippery slope to paying people to just not commit crimes. Have you lived in the
64.
by ablatt89 4y ago
Sigh, how can anyone hold a conversation with you when you keep going in circles, completely ignoring the specifics of an argument, stringently hold to your narrow definitions and when counteracted with a different argument, resort to &quot
65.
by ablatt89 4y ago
Indeed. Privileged upper middle class kids who've never lived as a poor person or lived in high crime areas, trying to solve everyone's problems without any life experiences nor evidence their solutions would work.
66.
by ablatt89 4y ago
Lol paying people not to wild out, insanity. Wildin' out is cool to many, being bad is cool and sexy. People will wild out and break any agreements regardless.
67.
by ablatt89 4y ago
Makes sense. While he certainly seems to be smart given his accomplishments, I think it's really up to the general educated populace to keep those who are in power and have technical understanding of things in check. It seems clear tha
68.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> Exploring historical art from new perspectives is interesting and valuable. It's valuable to you, fine. And some people critique its premise and existence. Why do you get upset when people critique it? Why do you dismiss any criti
69.
by ablatt89 4y ago
This is what you stated: "You are being dishonest by trying to redefine an already established term." Yet you claim I'm the one being emotional? Lol. Hypocrite much?
70.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> I think I see what the issue is. You are referring to male gaze, whereas I'm referring to Male Gaze. That's fine, but this project is about Male Gaze, or rather Female Gaze. I've been acknowledging your point of view, an
71.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> No, it is not, and this is why you're having a hard time understanding the purpose of this project, because you've decided that male gaze means something it doesn't, and are arguing from that perspective. You're cle
72.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> Why do you reply to your own comments instead of mine? There's no reply button underneath your posts as its getting more nested. I don't know why, possibly a bug? > This isn’t about what I want. This about the what the ter
73.
by ablatt89 4y ago
One new parameter = 1 new node on the crpto nutter's network to do additional compute for the parameter? Lol I can see many ways these crypto nutters can attempt to weakly justify purchasing into their network.
74.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> Whether actual scientists hold a view is not an argument (nor did I try to use it as one), but it is relevant to pointless random online arguments because it can help us spend our time better and not waste it on debunking things that n
75.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> Why do you reply to your own comments instead of mine? There's no reply button underneath your posts as its getting more nested. I don't know why, possibly a bug? > This isn’t about what I want. This about the what the ter
76.
by ablatt89 4y ago
I'm not an expert in ML theory, but from my perspective, I think more compute would cause better fitting for a model, but possibly overfitting if more parameters are not added. For some problem space, adding additional parameters intro
77.
by ablatt89 4y ago
And I guess we need to buy into their decentralized network so that this AGI compute can be done on their "clearly unbiased" crypto software that's running on the computers of all those who bought into the hype of their crypt
78.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> No, it is not, and this is why you're having a hard time understanding the purpose of this project, because you've decided that male gaze means something it doesn't, and are arguing from that perspective. I don't th
79.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> That's an uncharitable interpretation. People have an objection to speculations like many-worlds because they aren't corroborated by observation, and by nature can't be (iiuc), and are therefore unscientific (though not
80.
by ablatt89 4y ago
> What you are describing is the literal act of gazing. Your next two sentences are about media, but still mostly about the act of gazing. They had nothing to do with how men are portrayed by women directors, which would be the actual fe
81.
by ablatt89 4y ago
All these tech "influencers" and CEOs have such laughable opinions on AGI. First, they cannot really seem to give a formal definition of AGI (are we talking about some network that can problem solving in n > 2 problems or defin
82.
by ablatt89 4y ago
The male gaze is a representation of male attraction towards women in art. In my original post, I clearly state there ARE representations of female "gaze"/attraction of men, such as various female shows like The Sex Lives of
83.
by ablatt89 4y ago
Just because you say it's wrong, doesn't mean it's wrong. Let's use Stanford's Plato pages as a definition of the gaze: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-aesthetics/ "The ph
84.
by ablatt89 4y ago
The "gaze" is essentially about a male "checking out" a woman, and a woman desiring this gaze from the male. My argument is clear, that women DO gaze at men, and men DO appreciate the gaze and many are seeking the gaze f
85.
by ablatt89 4y ago
And women use makeup and look good to attract men, and there's no shame in it. I don't think there's any shame in attempting to look attractive, as if it's shallow. But that's aside the point, being that there'
86.
by ablatt89 4y ago
Something is happening, it's described by quantum mechanics. What is "really happening" is a moot question, because you're assuming that QM is in invalid description because it doesn't satisfy how you want the world
87.
by ablatt89 4y ago
I don't think this is a huge surprise given the insane cost of housing. Is there any data to show an increase in apartment and housing density actually drives down the median/average rental price? In addition, I'd also argue
88.
by ablatt89 4y ago
100% legit. In addition, the female gaze DOES exist. Has the creator never been to a gym full of attractive men with fit bodies, and observed women oogling at the men? Has the creator never observed how straight women will oogle at men with
89.
by ablatt89 4y ago
I think many "top" physicists (those with high citation counts in theory), generally believe in consistent histories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_histories That is, there is no collapse. QM is a
90.
by ablatt89 4y ago
The metrics that give rise to closed time like curves, wormholes, or the FTL metric (Alcubierre metric) don't seem really feasible given the constraints imposed on the stress-energy tensor. The paper seems interesting as it seems to at

More ›