Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
aapl88888
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
aapl88888
5y ago
You are using a false equivalence. Almost none of Swedish billionaires are in high tech.
2.
▲
by
aapl88888
5y ago
Almost all of them are old people outside of tech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Swedish_billionaires_b...
3.
▲
by
aapl88888
5y ago
Which US part suffered terribly?
4.
▲
by
aapl88888
5y ago
If the US had its eastern part communist, it too would have a higher average GDP from decades ago. It is basic economics.
5.
▲
by
aapl88888
5y ago
So the entire EU economy grew at the same speed than the US one but not its 500 bigger companies. This is misleading. The article says the poorer (former communist) eastern European countries got richer, which brought up the average.
6.
▲
by
aapl88888
5y ago
What a misleading article. Someone sent out a letter and requested signatures.
7.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
I just did a Google search for QAnon for Tucker and Fox News. The news on QAnon are labeled under "conspiracy" on foxnews.com. I see no promotion of the QAnon theory anywhere.
8.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
That is a ridiculous argument to be honest. 100% of Americans have heard of Nazism. Does that mean 100% of Americans are Nazis? By your logic, more Democrats are QAnon believers (28%).
9.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
I suspect you're lying because Pew research shows the vast majority of Republicans don't even know what QAnon is. More Democrats know about QAnon than Republicans (28% vs 18%). https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank
10.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
There is a rebuttal to the paper you cited https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-analysis/a...
11.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
You're arguing with a side that is using statistical analysis to detect fraud. Meanwhile your arguments are: - "fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missaplied (sic) statistics is the conspiracy theory" - "There are
12.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
Here's the research and code. It's all open source. I find it very convincing but that's just me. Do your own analysis https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords
13.
▲
by
aapl88888
6y ago
You can analyze the data yourself. There are sources and python scripts included https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords