You're arguing with a side that is using statistical analysis to detect fraud. Meanwhile your arguments are: - "fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missa

You're arguing with a side that is using statistical analysis to detect fraud. Meanwhile your arguments are: - "fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missaplied (sic) statistics is the conspiracy theory" - "There are already court cases with the best experts in the land looking at the counts" - "They are starting to be laughed out of court because they have no evidence to support their claims" I don't find your arguments compelling because you are arguing to authority. You also use a case that was dismissed that has nothing to do with Benford's Law. Please address specifically what data is being cherry picked and why Benford's Law shouldn't apply in this election.