aanm1988

6 ms·

1.
by aanm1988 9y ago
As opposed to corporations who stopped at a fair point when they started to kill unions off?
2.
by aanm1988 9y ago
and they got there by cramming it in everyones faces with their search monopoly. Totally different than bundling it with the OS. Except wait, they do that too.
3.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Are the ads really that awful, or just in an area where google isn't winning already?
4.
by aanm1988 9y ago
What's the response when a competitor (rightfully IMO) claims this is a blatant abuse of googles position as the leading browser provider?
5.
by aanm1988 9y ago
If you don't like it then vote with your feet.
6.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Comments like this annoy me. A few decades ago unions were powerful forces for worker rights, and served a major purpose by allowing collective bargaining. Nowadays we have "right to work" laws being sponsored by companies and peo
7.
by aanm1988 9y ago
A group leaving the country doesn't give 2 shits about the constitution. It comes down to how much you are willing to fight for it, and both sides would end up with nukes.
8.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Exactly. Other countries have working systems of government. The US needs to get their shit together.
9.
by aanm1988 9y ago
I doubt it gets that far, but it really does seem like something needs to change. The country doesn't necessarily need to shift as far left as california, but right not a set of old laws working with the modern shift towards cities is
10.
by aanm1988 9y ago
so is google. Conglomeration in general isn't great for the open web. That's where we are though.
11.
by aanm1988 9y ago
They have that, sorta https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/3463947?hl=en
12.
by aanm1988 9y ago
The problem I have with this is that Opiates have been known to be highly addictive for how long? I do feel like doctors should have questioned the notion that these drugs were completely safe.
13.
by aanm1988 9y ago
why would that form an addiction?
14.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Or they will get properly informed of the risks and have their dosages monitored by a doctor who is properly informed of the risks. Instead of getting handed opiates like they are harmless because the doctors believed the drug companies who
15.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Lets by realistic, this is far more dangerous day to day than terrorism. Neither are going to destroy the country. These drugs are going to destroy a lot of lives though.
16.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Why would I want to play a game that turns me into a insufferably pedantic jerk who can't let people just enjoy a damn movie?
17.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Huh, apparently Nintendo's chronic inability to judge a market extends to companies they work with.
18.
by aanm1988 9y ago
> but at least it's a standards compliment world. sure, but if Chrome de facto controls standards does that really matter?
19.
by aanm1988 9y ago
So don't talk to your spouse because they might get upset. Great relationship advice.
20.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Standards enable alternatives to spring up, so long as they interface properly. That helps with both innovation and competition.
21.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Arguments like this are the reason why things are becoming more locked down DRM riddled trash with no real concept of ownership. Why the internet is getting more and more siloed and full of walled gardens. Because it's easier that way
22.
by aanm1988 9y ago
> At a guess median age would be 40-45, Why, because they hire some industry leaders? What is this guess based on?
23.
by aanm1988 9y ago
I think Hanlon's Razor applies. They have no impetus to change and think they have found an approach that works reasonable well when given absurd amounts of candidates. The problem is the ridiculous false negative rate. I struggle to t
24.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Amazon doesn't.
25.
by aanm1988 9y ago
It's not nearly as bad when you have all the people who work on it with you. You look at who caused conflicts and send out emails. Don't land the merge until all commits are resolved. People who don't resolve their changes ge
26.
by aanm1988 9y ago
> Nobody can find my boss, and five minutes later, two policeman show up and escort me out of the building They didn't bother to check on the whole "I'm here to start work, my boss is <T>" ?
27.
by aanm1988 9y ago
> his "boss" is his boss, whether he dresses like a slob or not.
28.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Did pink shirts not go with the onions worn on belts? I don't really care either way on the subject of work attire, with one exception. I hate casual fridays. It matters or it doesn't quit with the bullshit.
29.
by aanm1988 9y ago
Nah man, it's all good. I mean sure, we keep giving absurd amounts of power to an ad company but it's google, who doesn't love google. If it was microsoft they already would have shut this down because of the backlash. Google
30.
by aanm1988 9y ago
and did they say "don't ever upgrade this"?

More ›