Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
a0123
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC Recall is opt-in and keeps data on-device I read this and I think: are you the only person on Earth to never have used a Microsoft product?
32.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
"Unpopular opinion", sure, how brave of you. Simple: they sure love to talk a big game about responsibilities and taking responsibilities. Until it's time to actually do it. For the good of the company of course (if the compa
33.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
> Jokes aside, how do you end up having more than 500 excess people than what you need? There never is an excess amount of workers (sure, there probably are 4-5 exceptions). What happens is that they need those employees, but instead are
34.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
> What nefarious purposes do you imagine the government has? Is matching suspected criminals against the crime database a nefarious purpose? This is just strange. Do you have no imagination whatsoever or have you never set foot in school
35.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
I'll bet everything I have they haven't destroyed the sample. Honest and sincere question: why would you even use their service in the first place?
36.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Have you not paid attention to twitter since he bought it? The guy has been forcing his accounts and shit takes onto everyone's timelines. Accounts have mysteriously started following his account when they never manually did it. Muting
37.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
A wonder weapon that makes the enemy feel hangover. Damn, I don't know who financed it but they need to get their money back.
38.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
You know, the sort of weapon everyone agrees is not possible or feasible at this stage. And definitely not a hysterical reaction based on some people who faked the most common symptoms ever and tried to make it look like something it wasn&#
39.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
That's how successful Telegram's PR has been. People believe - like you do - that it's end to end encrypted. It's not. The secret chats presumably are (if you trust Telegram). Secret chats are 1 to 1. So anything outside
40.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Yeah, and do you think France is going to arrest Durov on the Kremlin's request. Fun fact: the Russian government and high ranking officials are outraged by the arrest and are asking the Russian state to pressure France into releasing
41.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
About the custody thing, he's an extremely high flight risk. If the French authorities are serious about his arrest and it's not just a dumb PR move, there is absolutely no chance he's going to be released. Not without 24
42.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
The fun fact is that while Telegram won't make use of something akin to PicDNA to automatically detect CSAM, it will very happily take down your channel or group if you distribute copyrighted material. They do know how to respond to co
43.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
The Telegram fanatics for some reason are unwilling to hear it but we'll say it again: the reason why we still have an Internet in 2024 is that all those services at least attempt some form of moderation. With more or less success,
44.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Durov has been shilling his crypto scams while shitting on all those services you're talking about (well, at least Signal) claiming they don't do anything for privacy. Considering how he's tarnished Signal, there is absolutel
45.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
To be clear, the legislation in France and in the EU that is most likely behind this arrest is that companies have to at least try to do some moderation. There is an understanding that not everything can be moderated (obviously, the entire
46.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
This and the sexual blackmail the network fully permits. Although it's my understanding they have been doing slightly better when it comes down to children (the fact it was made possible in the first place is unbelievable though). Not
47.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
People got used to a fairly simple and efficient UI. Version 3 was a bit of an abrupt change. A bit like today when your favourite social network completely revamps its UI for no apparent reason and makes it look fancier without adding any
48.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
A remnant of simpler times. Foobar and VLC, any other software that has always worked and remained pretty much the same?
49.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Yeah, they just forgot to report 59.869280705993% instead of 60%. They would have got away with it too, if it weren't for those cunning statisticians. They just forgot to come up with a random, credible number. Happens to the best of u
50.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
No you see, they had the perfect plan. But they got foiled by that one thing they always forget at every single election (that never gets brought up when your government agrees with the result, because in that case it's just a "st
51.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
idk, a lot of system are never meant to be rebooted outside of the update schedule, so they wouldn't have been off in the first place. And if those systems control others, then there is a domino effect. I can see very well how one comp
52.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Especially since I'm assuming those organisations pay good money for those services (my org hasn't been affected and we don't use them but we're also very small so I wouldn't know).
53.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Can't use X like that anymore. Makes it sound like you're talking about the site formerly known as Tiwtter.
54.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
They still run Windows XP (og edition, not this patched rubbish) to make sure national security isn't compromised. The really important machines are still on Win 3.1.
55.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Feels like there is some sort of lesson we should learn as a society.
56.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
> That is impossible because the state has access to nuclear weapons, gigantic drills, thousands of intelligent people whose sole mission in life is to break down that wall, nearly infinite budget, etc. Those generic statements are great
57.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
An argument that could only be made by someone who's never read the news ever. Or dealt with police ever.
58.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
People wouldn't have had those issues had it not been for COVID. So how do you phrase it? Enlighten us without making us laugh. As someone put it earlier: it would be stupid to say "a gun is a lethal weapon only to someone who
59.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
We keep having "anti child exploitation" measures, like all the bloody time. It's been decades by now. And the problem keeps getting worse. So either it's just not working whatsoever and this is useless and should stop.
60.
▲
by
a0123
2y ago
Yes, but the current design and direction are very clearly not working. You can hardly blame them for trying to emulate what's currently working for everyone else when everything you've tried so far has led to your downfall.
More ›