_rolf

4 ms·

1.
by _rolf 5y ago
As you can imagine, the developers learned of the issue almost immediately. Within literally five minutes they had submitted a fixed version to the Play Store. Unfortunately for them, app updates only go live after they've been reviewe
2.
by _rolf 5y ago
This is an unfortunate story. These folks had been working on Smart Launcher 6, a major update, for over a year. It was quite well received on release and worked well... for about a week. Some developer (let's call them Greg) had inten
3.
The worst day ever for Smart Launcher(blog.smartlauncher.net)
1 points by _rolf 5y ago|2 comments
4.
by _rolf 9y ago
Yeah. "Perfect" in the way it can tell the difference between two photons or three photons over a period of time, but almost useless for anything else.
5.
by _rolf 9y ago
If I understand the paper correctly, this is a very poor technology for "normal" photography in its current state. On the pixel level, there are no shades of grey. You get fully black or fully white pixels only. You have to calcul
6.
by _rolf 9y ago
This post looks funny in the Digg RSS reader: https://i.imgur.com/TNASB3p.png
7.
by _rolf 10y ago
Probably best if you recreate the document from scratch and "in your own words".
8.
by _rolf 11y ago
I might buy one.
9.
by _rolf 11y ago
Well yes, I would expect five shirts to be women's, and if I'm lucky, perhaps one shirt belongs to a fellow gay man. Often zero.
10.
by _rolf 12y ago
Contact us didn't work. Reporting very poor performance on what seemed like a basic challenge: http://i.imgur.com/Q8pFCtE.png Came out as rmm 1.247 mm 111.513 am: 9.99: 3959 4.349 at was Luna L000 9.; n.nnn n.nnn n.nnn
11.
by _rolf 12y ago
But a lot of times "literally" literally means "literally". Why would you get all arrogant and superior over other people's use of language, then implement such an obviously broken concept? Literally the dumbest thi
12.
by _rolf 13y ago
It does not change. It never has. It still says "First edition 2012".