_kbh_

45 ms·

451.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> With all the money and equipment being donated I am surprised that they need budget drones Why risk a decent piece of equipment attriting the enemy's static defences when you can slam a $100 RPG into a tank or APC worth >1 mill
452.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
The data I am seeing from people suggests that the spike in radiation happened two days before the strike which totally discounts this idea. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FwLHn8XWYAMnNt4?format=jpg&name=... https:&#
453.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
Do you have a link that proves that any DU was even in that warehouse, far far behind the front line just before an offensive starts?.
454.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> The evidence being presented, is an anomaly in the background radiation matching the event [1]. Im not seeing any evidence of an anomaly?, do you have a link to one.
455.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Otherwise Russia will just keep sending warm bodies into the meat grinder until they either win or collapse. They could drag it on for a decade. > Russia still could win by just grinding their opponents down. They don’t seem to care
456.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> It seems a bit suspicious that on the one side of COVID the world was more or less peaceful and then on the other side we're seeing what seems to be an escalation [0] up to WWIII. Giving a country the weapons it needs to defend it
457.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> He didn't say parts of it, he said much of their military. He was clearly talking about there overall armed forces, but you seemingly want to interpret his words in a very narrow view. > You've mentioned 35.5k-43.5k KIA lo
458.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> You're deliberately omitting the fact that he says "Much of the Russian military" and "one of those" in a single sentence and presume that he only speaks about submarines, whereas much of the military is still
459.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> "Much of the Russian military has not been affected negatively by this conflict" [1] That's not even what he says, quote it properly. "Much of the Russian military has not be been affected negatively by this conflic
460.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> They just also have to allow me to choose different stores, or install another OS on my console if the OEM goes against my wishes Whose job would it be to maintain all of the compatibility layers for the custom hardware that consoles
461.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> It’s not senseless since they have explained the reasons at length, albeit their adversaries refused to listen. Ah yes the Russians are telling the truth this time guys, I promise, they are totally not lying about why they are invading
462.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
The steam deck is a way different value proposition compared to consoles though, console manufacturers take a loss for initial consoles sold until they can bring costs. Whereas the steam deck has likely been sold as a profit from day one.
463.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> If one party is pro se and the other is not, well I've never seen the pro se party get even a fair chance. Depends what you mean by a fair chance, a lot of the pro se stuff I have seen the judges effectively hold the hands of the
464.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> surrounding, containing, harming, weakening, and ideally destroying Russia is the ultimate goal, but the US has already largely achieved its aims -- mission accomplished. Russia is continuing to punch itself in the face, every day, sin
465.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Do you think that in places like hackernews there is more Russian propaganda than US propaganda ? Recently yes, you'd have to blind to not see the huge uptick in pro Russian posters on here lately. > I said that we will never k
466.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> i meant the shelling that continued in open violation of the minsk agreement per the UN and killed hundreds of civilians. The entire invasion by Russia in 2014 was in violation of the Budapest memorandum in the first place. More have b
467.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> did your ears perk up for the civilians in donbass getting shelled for eight years too? You mean the shelling that only exists because of a Russian started conflict with Russian soldiers?. I feel sorry for those dead civilians but I fa
468.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Yeah I don’t think it’s common knowledge in the west that our governments are doing the color revolution dance in Sudan. But Wagner (a Russian PMC) is arming the RSF which are the ones trying to overthrow the current government. So I f
469.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Going through your comment history, I would say you are either a very passionate american nationalist, or a state sponsored propaganda parrot ;) Im neither American or paid to be here, I just don't like imperialist wars of conques
470.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> If NATO wasn't as expansive, Russia probably wouldn't have invaded. J The only thing keeping Russia in check in eastern Europe in anyway, shape or form is NATO. NATO expansion stops Russian aggression not the other way around
471.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
you can easily add a lot of Oceania to that too.
472.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Define "real"? Is the civil war in Syria real? Was the civil war that had collapsed the Russian Empire real? If it is the foreign influence that confuses you - that is actually an expected thing: In most cases the sides of th
473.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> He already has a standing offer from RT. He's much more useful for the Russians pushing then talking points whilst not being on RT so I doubt he will end up there.
474.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> just pointing out that anyone who believes the TV is the purveyor of truth is not really going to be a productive discussion. I am merely quoting Russian TV not Western TV. > Don't you want to help the children? Not sure what h
475.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Do you still think wearing a covid mask out in public is a good idea for the safety of others? You’re really avoiding the question here, what do you call protecting a democracy if not what America is doing with Ukraine against imperial
476.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> "Protecting democracy"...the military industrial complex has been saying this as a justification for taking tax dollars and doing nasty things....for decades. What do you call arming a country against an imperialistic invader
477.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> On a serious note, I fail to see how RT is considered state-propaganda, but BBC is not I have yet to see a single article on RT saying that maybe the war in Ukraine isn't a good thing and Russia should leave. > MintPress hiring
478.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> By that definition, the US invasion began in 2014 too. Who do you think primarily supplied Ukraine with weapons and training? Im not sure what you think an invasion is, but wouldn't a foreign power, stationing their military in yo
479.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Taibbi is a credible journalist and is one of the few willing to expose major corruption within the government and corporate realms. We need more like him. Why the super secret contract then?, why the unwillingness to criticise musk on
480.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Do you think so even after the "Trump-Russia" fiasco and Twitter Files? No I think so after the very obvious Russian propaganda that is being pushed all over the internet. There was even a notable uptick of Russian propaganda

More ›