3 ms·
> Define "real"? Is the civil war in Syria real? Was the civil war that had collapsed the Russian Empire real? If it is the foreign influence that confuses you
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Define "real"? Is the civil war in Syria real? Was the civil war that had collapsed the Russian Empire real? If it is the foreign influence that confuses you - that is actually an expected thing: In most cases the sides of the civil war gravitate to nearest opposing poles of power, with the exception for secluded places like America.
A war that isn't started by a foreign power to try and destabilise the country is what id call a 'real' civil war, and it's clear the one in Ukraine was started by Russia.
> It's important not to be dismissive of the fact that the root cause of all the problems is that people in Ukraine can not agree on a sustainable way to run their country and that people in Donbas have no less rights then the people who pushed for the revolution. Everything else is just bullshit that distracts everyone from what's important - the people.
The root cause for a lot of it is Russian interference just like it is in what is it now? 4?, 5? post soviet states now.
- foverzar 4y ago> and it's clear the one in Ukraine was started by Russia. Clearly it wasn't Russia who started a revolution in Ukraine, was it? This is just going in circles, really. You are just avoiding the wrong-think of even assuming that just as there were people passionate about Euromaidan, there might have been others that had the opposite view. You are denying the nature of what a revolution is. > Russian interference just like it is in what is it now? 4?, 5? post soviet states now. Well sure, the Soviet Union had been dissolved like shit and Russia will inevitably be tied into every other issue, that's one of the reasons CSTO exist. Honestly, if "interference" is actually a principal problem, it is kinda ironic that it's only Russia that bothers you.